Transpozycja zasady non-refoulement do polskiego systemu ochrony uchodźców
2018, 76, No. 1
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Classification
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 440 KB
Number of views:439
Number of downloads:148
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
The paper aims at examining the influence of international legislations on the scope and content of the non-refoulement principle as articulated in the Polish law. Its shape on the Polish national ground is in fact a sum of influences stemming from external law systems. The article is based on the determination of three major sources of the refugee law that shape the content of the principle: public international law, European Union law and Polish national law. The Author first scrutinises the scope and content of the principle as laid down in crucial legislations belonging to these three sources which later enables their comparison and examination of the impact they make on one another in terms of conceptualisation of the principle of non-refoulement. The EU law reflects and specifies mechanisms established in the public international law which are further specified on a national ground. The final product is a national structure of the principle which is far more specific than the one known from the 1951 Refugee Convention that first stipulated it. The Author concludes with pointing at flaws and inaccuracies in a national articulation of the principle.
Keywords:

Other articles from the issue
Spis treści / Contents
- civil mediationalternative dispute resolutionmandatory mediationmediacja cywilnaalternatywne rozwiązywanie sporówobowiązkowa mediacja
Mediacja cywilna w polskim i włoskim systemie prawnym – próba porównania. Analiza pomysłu wprowadzenia obligatoryjnej mediacji cywilnej w Polsce
Martyna Barabas
- preliminary referenceEuropean Court of the Human Rightsconstitutional courtspytanie prejudycjalneEuropejski Trybunał Praw Człowiekasądy konstytucyjne
W poszukiwaniu remedium na bezradność jednostki wobec unikania przez sądy krajowe pytań prejudycjalnych do TSUE – stanowisko ETPCz i sądów konstytucyjnych państw członkowskich
Hubert Bekisz
Similar publications
20.03.2017
anti-terrorism lawconstitutional lawhuman rightsprinciple of proportionalitysecurityfreedomTension between Human Rights Protection and the Necessity to Ensure Public Security in the Context of Polish Anti-terrorism Law
Marta Kolendowska-Matejczuk, Krzysztof Szczucki
29.07.2025
sex selective abortionhuman rightsdiscriminationpersonhoodSex-Selective Abortion and the Problem of Discrimination
Ewa Rejman
13.12.2021
distrustpowerconstitutiondemocracystatehuman rightsnew technologiesjudicial poweroppositionnieufnośćwładzakonstytucjademokracjaprawa człowiekanowe technologiewładza sądowniczaopozycjaA Republic of distrust, fear and division. Rethinking contemporary Polish Experience
Ryszard Piotrowski

