Is it Possible and Worthwhile to Promote a World-Wide Model of Criminal Procedure?
2016, 67, Numer 1
University of Warsaw, Faculty of Law and Administration, Department of International Criminal Procedure
Uniwersytet Warszawski, Wydział Prawa i Administracji, Katedra Postępowania Karnego
DOI
Data publikacji
Model publikowania
Rodzaj licencji
Dziedzina
Dyscyplina
Język publikacji
Pliki do pobrania
PDF 288 KB
Liczba wyświetleń:75
Liczba pobrań:16
Cytowania Crossref:0
Wynik Altmetric:0
Abstrakt
This paper canvasses some of the limitations and possible negative consequences of globalization of criminal procedure. The references to specific examples in this paper assume generally the framework of the legal systems of the European Union and its member states. This, however, is done with the idea in mind that at least some of the remarks made here could be also relevant in a wider international context, when other legal systems are taken into consideration. In the paper, particular attention is paid to possible negative consequences of globalization tendencies. Assuming this perspective was intentional, in order to draw the reader’s attention, references are made to those issues which are especially important from the point of view of legal certainty of an individual but seem to attract less attention in the literature on the subject than general analyses of the phenomenon of synergy of legal systems and the benefits stemming therefrom.
Słowa kluczowe:
Bibliografia
Cape E., Hodgson J., Prakken T., Spronken T., Suspects in Europe. Procedural Rights at the Investigate Stage of the Criminal Process in the European Union, Antwerpen, Oxford 2007
Den Boer M., The fight against organised crime in Europe: a comparative perspective, “European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research” 2001, Vol. 9, issue 3
Gane C., Mackarel M., Admissibility of Evidence Obtained From Abroad Into Criminal Proceedings: The Interpretation of Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties and Use of Evidence Irregularly Obtained, “European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice” 1996, Vol. 4, issue 2
Kruszyński P., Pawelec S., European Code of Criminal Procedure, “Przegląd Sądowy” 2009, Vol. 1
Kuczyńska H., Wspólny obszar postępowania karnego w prawie Unii Europejskiej, Warszawa 2008
Ligeti K., Simonato M., The European Public Prosecutor’s Office: Towards a Truly European Prosecution Service?, “New Journal of European Criminal Law” 2013, Vol. 4
Rogacka-Rzewnicka M., Oportunizm i legalizm ścigania przestępstw w świetle współczesnych przeobrażeń procesu karnego, Warszawa 2007
Pawelec S., Implications of Enhanced Cooperation for the EPPO Model and Its Functioning, (in:) L. H. Erkelens, A. W. H. Meij, M. Pawlik (eds.), The European Public Prosecutor’s Office: An Extended Arm or a Two-Headed Dragon?, Hague 2014
Pawelec S., Uwagi na temat zakresu kompetencji przyszłej Prokuratury Europejskiej, “Palestra” 2014, issue 5–6
Sieber U., Euro-fraud: Organised Fraud Against the Financial Interests of the European Union, “Law and Social Change” 1998, Vol. 30,
Velkova E., Georgievski S., Fighting trans-border organized crime in Southeast Europe through fighting corruption in customs agencies, (in:) E. Athanassopoulou, Fighting organised crime in Southeast Europe, New York 2005
Inne artykuły z tego numeru
- -
Foreword
Valeri Vachev, Krzysztof Szczucki
- criminal lawconstitutional lawhuman dignityguiltculpabilitycriminal liability
The Impact of Human Dignity on the Principles of Criminal Liability. The Example of Guilt
Krzysztof Szczucki
- terrorismhijacked aircraftexculpatory necessityjustifying necessityself-defenceconsent
Combating Terrorism at the Expense of Innocent People. A Criminal Law Perspective
Jutta Taferner