Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Studia Iuridica

Preferowane podejścia do rozwiązywania konfliktów wśród polskich i amerykańskich studentów prawa, w kontekście systemu kształcenia

2018, 78, Numer 1

Ewa Gmurzyńska

0000-0003-3726-1573

Anna Cybulko

Aleksandra Winiarska

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0013.2139

Data publikacji

29.05.2019

Model publikowania

open access

Rodzaj licencji

CC BY 4.0 Int.

Dziedzina

Prawo

Dyscyplina

nauki prawne

Język publikacji

Polski

Pliki do pobrania

PDF 432 KB

Artykuł

Liczba wyświetleń:451

Liczba pobrań:34

Cytowania Crossref:0

Wynik Altmetric:0

Abstrakt

The purpose of this article is to initially identify conflict resolution strategies among law students of the University of Warsaw, as well as to compare their approach to conflict resolution to similar research done among US law students. In this study Thomas-Kilmann Test was used as a tool for analyzing the preferred conflict resolution approaches. The test was developed in the US but also used in other parts of the world. The results of test among the Polish students obtained during the study were compared with available data of US students. The study was conducted to verify the approach to conflict resolution for those who start legal profession carrier. The researchers were also interested in the question whether the attitude to the conflict changed during the legal education.

Słowa kluczowe:

Bibliografia

Coben J. R., Summer Musings on Curricular to Change the Lawyer’s Standard Philosophical Map, „University of Florida Law Review” 1998, Vol. 50

Craver C. B., The Impact of Gender on Clinical Negotiation Achievement, „Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution” 1990, Vol. 6, No. 1

Daicoff S. S., Expanding The Lawyer’s Toolkit of Skills and Competences: Synthesizing Leadership, Professionalism, Emotional Intelligence, Conflict Resolution and Comprehensive Law, „Santa Clara Law Review” 2012, Vol. 52, No. 795

Daicoff S. S., Lawyers Know Thyself; A Psychological Analysis of Personality Strengths and Weaknesses, Washington 2004

Daicoff S. S., Making Law Therapeutic for Lawyers: Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Preventive Law and the Psychology of Lawyers, „Psychology Public Policy and Law” 1999, Vol. 5

Gmurzyńska E., Potrzeba nowych kierunków zmian w edukacji prawniczej, (w:) Rola prawników w alternatywnych metodach rozwiązywania sporów, Warszawa 2014

Goldfien J. H., Robbenholt J. K., What if the Lawyers have Their Way? An Empirical Assessment of Conflict Strategies and Attitudes Toward Mediation Styles, „Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution” 2007, Vol. 22

Guthrie C., The Lawyer’s Philosophical Map and the Disputant’s Perceptual Map: Impediments to Facilitative Mediation and Lawyering, „Harvard Negotiation Law Review” 2001, Vol. 6

Herk N. A., Thompson R. C., Thomas K. W., Kilmann R. W., International Technical Brief For The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument, http://www.kilmanndiagnostics.com/sites/default/kilmann-private-10020393424lksdjfksdjfl093u/TKI_International_Brief.pdf (dostęp: 14.09.2018 r.)

Kilmann R. H., Thomas K. W., Comparison of Four Instruments Measuring Conflict Behavior, „Psychological Reports” 1977, Vol. 42, No. 3

Kilmann R. H., Thomas K. W., Developing a Forced-Choice Measure of Conflict-Handling Behavior, „Educational and Psychological Measurement” 1977, Vol. 37, No. 2, http://www.kilmanndiagnostics.com/developing-forced-choice-measure-conflict-handling-behavior-mode-instrument (dostęp: 29.10.2018 r.)

Kilmann R. H., Frequently asked questions about the TKI Assessment, http://www.kilmanndiagnostics.com/frequently-asked-questions-about-tki-assessment (dostęp: 14.09.2018 r.)

Korobkin R., Guthrie C., Psychology, Economics, and Settlement: A New Look at the Role of Lawyers, „Texas Law Review” 1997, Vol. 76

Kupfer-Schneider A., Shattering Negotiation Myths Empirical Evidence on the Effectiveness of Negotiation Style, „Harvard Negotiation Law Review” 2002, Vol. 7, No. 143

Love L. P., Twenty-Five Years Later with Promises to Keep: Legal Education in Dispute Resolution and Training of Mediators, „Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution” 2002, Vol. 17

Łojko E., O potrzebie badania wzajemnych relacji między prawnikami a dziennikarzami, (w:) E. Łojko (red.), Prawnicy i dziennikarze ‒ współpraca, rywalizacja, manipulacja, Warszawa 2012

Łojko E., Dziurnikowska-Stefańska M. (red.), Wartości a sukces zawodowy prawników – granice kompromisu, Warszawa 2011

Łojko E., Opinie studentów prawa o Wydziale i jego kadrze, (w:) E. Łojko (red.), Studenci prawa o studiach i perspektywach zawodowych, Warszawa 2011

Mayer J. D., Salovey P., Caruso D. R., Emotional Intelligence. New Abelit or Eclectic Traits?, „American Psychologist” 2008, Vol. 63, No. 6

Nelken M. L., The Myth of the Gladiator and Law Students Negotiation Styles, „Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution” 2005, Vol. 7, Vol. 1

Nauaman J., Zbiór Zasad Etyki Adwokackiej i Godności Zawodu. Komentarz, Warszawa 2012

Shell G. R., Bargaining Styles and Negotiation: The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument in Negotiation Training, „Negotiation Journal” 2001, Vol. 17

Riskin L., Mediation and Lawyers, „Ohio State Law Journal” 1982, Vol. 43

Peters D., Peters D., Forever Jung: Psychological Type Theory: the Myers – Briggs Type Indicator and Learning Negotiation, „Drake Law Review” 1993, Vol. 42, No. 1

Shell G. R., Bargaining for Advantage, New York 2001

Shell G. R., Bargaining Styles and Negotiation: The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument in Negotiation Training, „Negotiation Journal” 2001, Vol. 17

Rose J., MacCrate Report: A Restatement of Legal Education-The Need for Reflection and Horse Sense, „Journal of Legal Education” 1994, Vol. 44

Williams G. R., Legal Negotiation and Settlement, Saint Paul, Minnesota 1983

Podobne publikacje