JURYSDYKCJA SZCZEGÓLNA W SPRAWACH O NARUSZENIE DÓBR OSOBISTYCH W INTERNECIE Z PERSPEKTYWY PRAWA UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ
2021, 87, Numer 1
Data publikacji
Model publikowania
Rodzaj licencji
Dziedzina
Dyscyplina
Język publikacji
Pliki do pobrania
PDF 408 KB
Liczba wyświetleń:134
Liczba pobrań:82
Cytowania Crossref:0
Wynik Altmetric:0
Abstrakt
This article aims to analyze the European Union law in terms of the jurisdiction applicable in cases of infringement of personal rights on the Internet. After a short introduction to issues of technical, technological and civilizational progress, consideration is given to the fact that the Internet has become a common platform of human activity. The role, characteristics, and specificity of this state of affairs are presented, and the consequences assessed. The paper then turns to the fact that the problem of determining the applicable jurisdiction in the European Union law is based on general terms from which there are normative exceptions. Such exceptions include a special jurisdiction mechanism that is analysed in this paper. With regard to the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the paper proposes ways the jurisdiction of European Union Member States should be determined in cases of infringement of personal rights on the Internet. The paper also contains postulates related to the interpretation of relevant Union legislation, which are directed to legislative and judicial authorities. The discussion is closed with a brief summary of the authors’ reflections on the analysed issues, as well as some comments on the recent relevant cases.
Bibliografia
Adamczak-Retecka M., Wtórne prawo, (w:) B. Hołyst, R. Hauser (red.), Wielka encyklopedia prawa, t. III: Z. Brodecki (red.), Prawo Unii Europejskiej, Warszawa 2014
Adelakun O., Garcia R., Technical Factors in Telemedicine Adoption in Extreme Resource-Poor Countries, (w:) M. Olivier, C. Croteau-Chonka (eds.), Global Health and Volunteering Beyond Borders, Cham 2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98660-9_7
Afsarmanesh H., Masís V., Hertzberger L., Virtual Community Support in Telecare, (w:) L. Camarinha-Matos, H. Afsarmanesh (esd.), Processes and Foundations for Virtual Organizations. PRO-VE 2003. IFIP - The International Federation for Information Processing, Boston 2004
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35704-1_22
Bagan-Kurluta K., Prawo międzynarodowe prywatne, Warszawa 2017
Borsdorff A., Computerkriminalität, (w:) H. Lange (Hrsg.), Wörterbuch zur Inneren Sicherheit, Heidelberg 2006
Czepelak M., Umowa międzynarodowa jako źródło prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego, Warszawa 2008
Dutton W., Internet Studies: Foundations of a Transformative Field, (w:) W. Dutton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies, Oxford 2013
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.013.0001
Elenko E., Underwood L., Zohar D., Defining digital medicine, "Nature biotechnology" 2015, No 33/5
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3222
Francetic I., E-health in Switzerland: The laborious adoption of the federal law on electronic health records (EHR) and health information exchange (HIE) networks, "Health Policy" 2018, No 122/2
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.11.005
Gao X., Lin L., Lan T., Gan X., Design and Research on the Chinese Medicine Health Management System Based on the Wireless Sensor Network, (w:) Z. Xu, K. Choo, A. Dehghantanha, R. Parizi, M. Hammoudeh (eds.), Cyber Security Intelligence and Analytics. CSIA 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Cham 2020
Golak M., Jurysdykcja w sprawach roszczeń o naprawienie szkody wyrządzonej wykonaniem zabezpieczenia w rozporządzeniu (EU) nr 1215/2012, "Przegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza" 2016, nr 6
https://doi.org/10.14746/ppuam.2016.6.22
Insa F., The admissibility of electronic evidence in court (AEEC): fighting against high-tech crime-results of a European study, "Journal of Digital Forensic Practice" 2007, No ¼
https://doi.org/10.1080/15567280701418049
Jakubowski J., Prawo międzynarodowe prywatne. Zarys wykładu, Warszawa 1984
Jankowska M., Podmiotowość prawna sztucznej inteligencji?, (w:) A. Bielska-Brodziak (red.), O czym mówią prawnicy, mówiąc o podmiotowości, Katowice 2015
Karska E., Pierwotne prawo, (w:) B. Hołyst, R. Hauser (red.), Wielka encyklopedia prawa, t. III: Z. Brodecki (red.), Prawo Unii Europejskiej, Warszawa 2014
Kenig-Witkowska M., Łazowski A., Ostrihansky R., Prawo instytucjonalne Unii Europejskiej, Warszawa 2011
Łazowski A., Rozporządzenie jako źródło prawa Wspólnot Europejskich, "Europejski Przegląd Sądowy" 2007, nr 3
Ludwiczak W., Międzynarodowe prawo prywatne, Warszawa 1990
Mechael P., The case for mHealth in developing countries, "Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization" 2009, No 4/1
https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2009.4.1.103
Miller M., The Ultimate Guide to bitcoin, Indianapolis 2014
Ohly A., The broad concept of "communication to the public" in recent CJEU judgments and the liability of intermediaries: primary, secondary or unitary liability?, "Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice" 2018, No 13/8
https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpy083
Pazdan M., Prawo prywatne międzynarodowe, Warszawa 2017
Rose F., Blackstone's Statutes on Commercial and Consumer Law 2020-2021, Oxford 2020
Sieroń A., Czym jest Bitcoin?, "Ekonomia - Wroclaw Economic Reviev" 2013, nr 19/4
Stone P., EU Private International Law: Third Edition, Massachusetts 2014
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782544517
Szpunar A., Zadośćuczynienie za szkodę majątkową, Bydgoszcz 1999
Venot A., Burgun A., Després S., Degoule P., Medical Informatics as a Scientific Discipline, (w:) A. Venot, A. Burgun, C. Quantin (eds.), Medical Informatics, e-Health. Health Informatics, Paris 2014
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0478-1
Wachter S., Normative challenges of identification in the Internet of Things: Privacy, profiling, discrimination, and the GDPR, "Computer law & security review" 2018, No 34/3
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.02.002