FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND HATE SPEECH – LAW AND ATTITUDES OF POLES. AN EMPIRICAL STUDY
2023, 99, Numer 1
University of Warsaw
University of Warsaw, Faculty of Political Sciences and International Studies
University of Warsaw
University of Warsaw
Data publikacji
Model publikowania
Rodzaj licencji
Dziedzina
Dyscyplina
Język publikacji
Pliki do pobrania
PDF 535 KB
Liczba wyświetleń:180
Liczba pobrań:61
Cytowania Crossref:0
Wynik Altmetric:0
Abstrakt
Objective: reconstruction of attitudes of Poles towards selected restrictions on freedom of speech and also towards hate speech in Polish law (selected issues). Methods: the approach to data collection included a computer-assisted telephone survey on a sample of N=1,000 adult Poles (18+) and an analysis using descriptive statistics and selected inductive statistics techniques (covariance measures and cluster analysis). Results: an analysis of the aggregate and sub-dimensions of Poles’ attitudes toward selected limits of freedom of speech in the Polish legal system and Poles’ experiences of actions considered violations of freedom of speech was conducted. Groups with different attitudes toward these phenomena and, as a result, different susceptibility to political messages of attempts to limit freedom of speech were identified. Conclusions: Poles value freedom of speech, although – in a sense – they want to limit it; They recognise that it is essential for democracy, but at the same time they do not believe that they can use it properly and, above all, effectively. We observe the paradox of support for freedom of speech or, in another convention, symptoms of ‘flight from freedom’.
Słowa kluczowe:
Bibliografia
Arystoteles, Polityka, (in:) Dzieła wszystkie, v. I, A. Paciorek, L. Regner, P. Siwek (trans.), Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warsaw 2003
Bayer J., Bárd P., Hate speech and hate crime in the EU and the evaluation of online content regulation approaches, European Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, European Union 2020
Blashfield R.K., The Growth Of Cluster Analysis: Tryon, Ward, And Johnson, "Multivariate Behavioral Research", 1980, Vol.15, No. 4, pp. 439- 458
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1504_4
Bojanowski T., Wybrane prawnokarne aspekty mowy nienawiści w kontekście standardów ochrony wolności słowa, "Prawo w Działaniu", 2021, 47, pp. 168-186
https://doi.org/10.32041/PWD.4710
Brick J.M., Brick P.D., Dipko S., Presser S., Tucker C., Yuan Y., Cell phone survey feasibility in the U.S.: Sampling and calling cell numbers versus landline numbers, "Public Opinion Quarterly", 2007, 71, pp. 23-39
https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl040
Brick J.M., Dipko S., Presser S., Tucker C., Yuan Y., Nonresponse bias in a dual frame sample of cell and landline numbers, "Public Opinion Quarterly", 2006, 70, pp. 780-793
Brubaker S.C., Freedom of speech, (in:) The Encyclopedia of Democracy, Vol. II, S.M. Lipset (ed.), Routledge, London 1995
Cattell R.B., The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters, "Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology", 1943, Vol. 38, pp. 476-506,
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054116
Council of Europe, Hate Speech, https://www.coe.int/en/web/freedom-expression/hate-speech (accessed April 2023)
Czekanowski J., Objectiv kriterien in der ethnologie, "Korrespondenzblatt der Deutschen Gesselschaft fur Anthropologie, Ethnologie, und Urgeschichte", 1911, Vol. 47, pp. 1-5
Downs D.A., Nelson S., Censorship, (in:) The Encyclopedia of Democracy, v. I, S.M. Lipset (ed.), Routledge, London 1995
Driver H.E., Kroeber A.L., Quantitative expression of cultural relationships, University of California Publications in American Archaeology, 1932, Vol. 31, pp. 211-256
Euroskopia, Europejski sondaż społeczny, N=9000, CATI/CAWI, November - December 2022
Fromm E., Ucieczka od wolności, O. Ziemilska, A. Ziemilski (trans.), Wydawnictwo "Czytelnik", Warsaw 2008
Haerpfer C., Inglehart R., Moreno A., Welzel C., Kizilova K., Diez-Medrano J., Lagos M., Norris P., Ponarin E., Puranen B. (eds.), World Values Survey: Round Seven - Country-Pooled Datafile Version 5.0, Madrid, Spain & Vienna, Austria: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat.
https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.20
Justitia, Who Cares about Free Speech?: Findings from a Global Survey of Support for Free Speech, (in:) https://futurefreespeech.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Report_Who-cares-about-free-speech_21052021.pdf (accessed April 2023)
Keeter S., Dimock M., Kennedy C., Best J., Horrigan J., Costs and benefits of full dual frame telephone survey designs, Paper presented at the 63rd Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, New Orleans, 2008
Kennedy C., Evaluating the effects of screening for telephone service in dual frame RDD surveys, "Public Opinion Quarterly", 2007, 71, pp. 750-771
https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm050
Łopatka A., Prawo do swobodnego wyrażania opinii, Wydawnictwo "Scholar", Warsaw 1993
Mika S., Psychologia społeczna, Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1981
Paz A.M., Montero-Díaz J., Moreno-Delgado A., Hate Speech: A Systematized Review, 2020, 10(4),
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020973022
Pew Research Center, Spring 2015 Global Attitudes Survey, https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2015/11/18/appendix-c-detailed-tables/#free-speech (accessed April 2023)
Polibiusz, Dzieje, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wroclaw 2005
Potthoff R.F., Some generalisation of the Mitofsky-Waksberg technique for Random Digit Dialling, "Journal of the American Statistical Association", 1982, Vol. 82, pp. 409-418
https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1987.10478443
Skaaning S.-E., Krishnarajan S., Who Cares About Free Speech? Findings from a Global Survey of Support for Free Speech, Justitia 2021, https://futurefreespeech.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Report_Who-cares-about-free-speech_21052021.pdf (accessed April 2023)
Sokal R.R., Sneath P.H., Principles of numerical taxonomy. San Francisco-London: Freeman 1963
https://doi.org/10.2307/1217562
Sunstein C.R., Sprzeciw w życiu społeczeństw, Wydawnictwo Sejmowe, Warsaw 2006
Tucker C., Casady R., Lepkowski J., Sample Allocation For Stratified Telephone Sample Designs, Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Sections, American Statistical Association, Alexandria 1992, pp. 566-571
Tukidydes, Wojna peloponeska, trans. K. Komaniecki, Wydawnictwo "Czytelnik", Warsaw 1988
Wakesberg J., Sampling Methods for Random Digit Dialling, "Journal of the American Statistical Association", 1973, Vol. 73, pp. 40-46
https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1978.10479995
Wizje Stanów Zjednoczonych w pismach Ojców Założycieli, Wiktor Osiatyński (ed.), Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, Warsaw 1977
Inne artykuły z tego numeru
- women’s rightspro-life movementhuman rightsinfertility treatmentdigitalised work of womenethics of careviolencegender ideologywomen in the Catholic Churchclimate migrantscontract farming
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- women’s rightsrights of pregnant womenreproductive rightstermination of pregnancy
WOMEN’S RIGHTS AND PRO-LIFE MOVEMENT: OPPOSITION OR HARMONY?
Dobrochna Bach-Golecka
- human rights inflationwomen’s rightsgender-based violenceconflict-related sexual violencereproductive rights
THE ANALYSIS OF HUMAN RIGHTS ‘INFLATION’ IN THE CONTEXT OF EVOLVING INTERNATIONAL REGIME OF WOMEN’S RIGHTS
Zuzanna Buszman