Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Studia Iuridica

THE ETHICS OF CARE AS A FEMINIST CRITIQUE OF KANTIANISM, UTILITARIANISM AND LIBERALISM

2023, 99, Numer 1

Dariusz Juruś

0000-0002-2108-9361

Jagiellonian University in Cracow

DOI

10.31338/2544-3135.si.2024-99.5

Data publikacji

03.02.2024

Model publikowania

otwarty dostęp

Rodzaj licencji

CC BY 4.0 Int.

Dziedzina

Dziedzina nauk społecznych

Dyscyplina

nauki prawne

Język publikacji

angielski

Pliki do pobrania

PDF 372 KB

Artykuł

Liczba wyświetleń:265

Liczba pobrań:134

Cytowania Crossref:0

Wynik Altmetric:0

Abstrakt

In the paper, I discuss ethics of care as a feminist critique of Kantianism, utilitarianism and liberalism. The critique focuses on justice, rationality, individualism and the free market. The perspective taken by the proponents of the ethics of care is based on emotions, sensitivity and empathy. The ethics of care is based on the life experiences of women, while the ethics appealing to logic grows out of the experiences of men. The ethics of care focuses on relations, while traditional ethics refers to rules, norms and rights. It considers relations between family members or friends, based on care, as crucial for the whole society. From that point of view, the ethics of care criticizes liberalism which splits human life into two separate spheres – private and public.

Słowa kluczowe:

care,justice,emotions,rationality,reason,individualism

Bibliografia

Baier A., Moral Prejudices, Cambridge 1995

Bentham J., The Rationale of Reward, (in:) J. Bowring (ed.), The Works of Jeremy Bentham, Vol. I, Vol. II, Edinburgh 1838-43

Gilligan C., In a Different Voice, Cambridge 1982

Held V., The Ethics of Care, Oxford 2006

https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195325911.003.0020

Kaniowski A. M., Filozofia praktyczna Immanuela Kanta - jej siła i słabości, "Diametros" 2004, No. 2

Kant I., Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, (transl. and edited by M. Gregor), Cambridge 1998

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809590

Kohlberg L., From Is to Ought: How to Commit the Naturalistic Fallacy and Get Away with It in the Study of Moral Development, (in:) T. Mischel (ed.), Cognitive Development and Epistemology, New York-London 1971

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-498640-4.50011-1

Kohlberg L., Moral Stages and Moralization. The Cognitive-Developmental Approach, (in:) T. Lickona (ed.), Moral Development and Behaviour, New York 1976

Kohlberg L., Essays on Moral Development, Vol. I: The Philosophy of Moral Development, San Francisco 1981

Noddings N., Caring. Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education, Berkeley 1984

Rawls J., Political liberalism, Columbia 1993

Rawls J., A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass. 1999

https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042582

Ross W. D., The Right and the Good, Oxford 1930

Uliński U., Etyka troski i jej pogranicza, Kraków 2012

Verden H., Kant's moral theory and Feminist Ethics Women. Embodiment, Care Relations and Systematic, Injustice, https://www.academia.edu/34232510/Kants_moral_theory_and_Feminist_Ethics_Women_embodiment_care_relations_and_systemic_injustice

Williams B., Moral Luck, Cambridge 1981

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165860

Podobne publikacje