Commentary to the judgement of the european court of human rights of 23 november 2023 in the case of wałęsa v poland (application no 50849/21)
2024, 103, No. 1
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 354 KB
Number of views:227
Number of downloads:136
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
In the commented judgment of 23 November 2023, issued in the case of "Wałęsa v Poland" (application no. 50849/21), the European Court of Human Rights stated that the extraordinary complaint, which has been functioning in the Polish legal system since 2018, is incompatible with the standards of a fair trial and the principle of legal certainty under Article 6(1) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The author, sharing reservations about the extraordinary complaint brought by the European Court of Human Rights, discusses the fundamental defects of this institution with regard to the broader domestic context and formulates de lege ferenda conclusions. The commentary also indicates that the defectiveness of the extraordinary complaint also manifests itself in other aspects that were overlooked in the commented judgement. For this reason, it is necessary to undertake a deeper, systemic reflection on this legal institution before its possible reform.
Keywords:
Other articles from the issue
- artificial intelligencelegal acts of the European UnionConvention on Human Rightsprohibition of collective expulsion of aliensthe dam on the New Kakhovkapreventive detention in PolandFrench financial judiciaryadministrative agreementpublic finance actEuropean Court Of Human Rights
Table of contents
- artificial intelligencejudge‘franc’ caseright to a court
Artificial intelligence and case categories in civil proceedings
Tomasz Szanciło
- European Unionlegislationcorrigendacorrecting acts
Correction of errors in legal acts of the european union
Marcin Baryń, Paweł Kowalski
Similar publications
11.09.2017
criminal proceedingsaccusedjudicaturedirect coercionPolish Constitutional TribunalEuropean Court of Human Rightspostępowanie karneoksarżonyorzecznictwoprzymus bezpośredniTrybunał KonstytucyjnyEuropejski Trybunał Praw CzłowiekaKonstytucyjne granice stosowania przymusu bezpośredniego względem oskarżonego. Uwagi na tle orzecznictwa TK i ETPCz
Anna Sikora
24.04.2023
reopening of proceedingsextraordinary appealpetition to reopen proceedingscourt jurisdictionthe Supreme CourtSkarga o wznowienie postępowania zakończonego orzeczeniem sądu najwyższego ze skargi nadzwyczajnej
Krzysztof Olszak
12.05.2019
Rule of Lawsupremacy of lawprinciple of legalitylegal certaintyfair trialprotection of vulnerable victimsstate of emergencypolice custodypre-trial detentionpraworządnośćnadrzędność prawazasada legalnościpewność prawarzetelny procesochrona szczególnie narażonych ofiarstan wyjątkowyareszt policyjnyareszt przedprocesowyThe Rule of Law in Turkey: Some Procedural Aspects in Criminal Cases
Feridun Yenisey

