CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF SELF-DRIVING VEHICLES UNDER HUNGARIAN CRIMINAL LAW
2023, 100, No. 1
Eötvös Loránd University in Budapest, Faculty of Law, Department of Criminal Law
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 322 KB
Number of views:105
Number of downloads:55
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
As self-driving evolves day by day, the accidents attributed to such technology will increase as well. If the legal environment does not prepare for these cases, the ‘liabilityvacuum’ caused by the diverging court practices could lead to the rejection of the self-driving vehicles both by the consumers and the legislators. I am approaching the various questions posed by this technology from a continental standpoint, therefore the research examines the liability of the natural persons behind the technology. If we can provide possible answers to these issues, then the criminal liability of legal persons – an unfamiliar concept from the standpoint of the majority of the continental criminal law regimes – does not have to be applied to answer the central questions. If the national rules can determine the obligations of the natural persons travelling in a self-driving vehicle, their criminal liability can be decided accordingly and there is no need to create new offences.
Keywords:
Bibliography
Eisenstein P., A Driverless Tesla Will Travel From L.A. to NYC by 2017, Says Musk, nbcnews, 20.10.2006, https://www.nbcnews.com/business/autos/driverless-tesla-will-travel-l-nyc-2017-says-musk-n670206
Ambrus I., A közlekedési büntetőjog új kihívása a 21. században: az önvezető járművek, (in:) Hollán M., Mezei K. (eds), A büntetőjog hazai rendszere megújításának koncepcionális céljai és hatásai, Budapest 2020
Ambrus I., A mesterséges intelligencia és a büntetőjog, ‘Állam- és Jogtudomány’ 2020, No. 4
Ambrus I., Az autonóm járművek és a büntetőjogi felelősségre vonás akadályai, (in:) K. Mezei (ed.), A bűnügyi tudományok és az informatika, Budapest–Pécs 2019
Ambrus I., Az önvezető járművek várható hatása a közlekedési bűncselekményekre, ‘Ügyészek Lapja’ 2018, No. 6
Ambrus I., Digitalizáció és büntetőjog, Budapest 2021
Backup Driver for Self-Driving Uber that Killed Arizona Pedestrian Pleads Guilty, The Guardian, 01.08.2023, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/aug/01/uber-self-driving-arizona-deadly-crash (accessed 01.08.2023)
Bede M., Uj P., Winkler R., Borízű Hang #112, 444, 5.03.2023, https://444.hu/2023/03/05/borizu-hang-112-az-automatizalt-boris-johnson-es-az-internetes-nimbyzmus (accessed 07.03.2023)
Eszteri D., A mesterséges intelligencia fejlesztésének és üzemeltetésének egyes felelősségi kérdései, ‘Infokommunikáció és Jog’ 2015, No. 2–3
Davies R., Ford Names Jim Hackett as New CEO in Push to Build Self-Driving Cars, The Guardian, 22.05.2017, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/22/ford-sack-ceo-senior-bosses-push-build-self-driving-cars (accessed 10.01.2020)
Gellér B., Ambrus I., A magyar büntetőjog általános tanai I., Budapest 2019
Gless, S., Silverman E., Weigend T., If Robots Cause Harm, Who is to Blame? Self-Driving Cars and Criminal Liability, ‘New Criminal Law Review’ 2016, No. 3
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2724592
Hungarian Central Statistical Office (KSH): 2.4.3. Személysérüléses közúti közlekedési balesetek az előidéző okok szerint, KSH, 05.03.2021, https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_evkozi_2_4 (accessed 10.03.2023)
Moral Machine, https://www.moralmachine.net (accessed 05.03.2023)
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Federal Automated Vehicles Policy – Accelerating the Next Revolution In Roadway Safety, U.S. Department of Federal Transportation, 2016, https://www.transportation.gov/AV/federal-automated-vehicles-policy-september-2016 (accessed 23.02.2020)
Patrick L., Abney K., Jenkins R. (eds), Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence, Oxford 2017
Shuttleworth J., SAE J3016 Levels of Driving Automation, SEA, 07.01.2019, https://www.sae.org/news/2019/01/sae-updates-j3016-automated-driving-graphic (accessed 20.02.2020)
Shepardson D., Somerville H., Uber not Criminally Liable in Fatal 2018 Arizona Self-Driving Crash: Prosecutors, Reuters, 5.03.2019, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-uber-crash-autonomous-idUSKCN1QM2O8 (accessed 20.02.2020)
SAE International, SAE International Releases Updated Visual Chart for Its “Levels of Driving Automation” Standard for Self-Driving Vehicles, SAE, 11.12.2018, https://www.sae.org/news/3544/ (accessed 10.02.2020)
Viski L., Közlekedési büntetőjog, Budapest, 1974
WHO, Road Traffic Injuries, WHO, 20.06.2022, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/road-traffic-injuries (accessed 10.02.2023)
Other articles from the issue
Similar publications
21.12.2025
camerasbody-worn cameraspolicesurveillancenew technologiesartificial intelligenceTHE COMPARISON OF POLISH AND GERMAN MODELS FOR THE UTILISATION OF POLICE BODY-WORN CAMERAS
Jędrzej Kupczyński
29.02.2024
artificial intelligencealgorithmscreditworthinessbanking lawbanksTHE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ASSESSING A BANK CUSTOMER’S DEBT CAPACITY
Antonina Chłopecka
23.01.2023
negligenceguiltfree willdeterminismmeaning of “(s)he could have”purpose of punishmentDIE BEDEUTUNG VON „KÖNNEN“ BEI FAHRLÄSSIGKEIT UND SCHULD
Kurt Schmoller