ONTOLOGY OF LEGAL PERSONHOOD
2025, 109, No. 1
Uniwersytet Warszawski, Wydział Prawa i Administracji UW
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 320 KB
Number of views:6
Number of downloads:11
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
The recent emergence of novel entities aspiring to legal personhood – including artificial intelligence, non-human animals, and environmental features – has challenged traditional theories of the ontology of legal personhood, which originally centred on corporate personality. This article provides a conceptual roadmap of the ontological views surrounding legal personhood by bridging historical theories of the corporation (Aggregate Theory, Concessionism, and Realism) with contemporary analytical metaphysics. In doing so, the paper identifies and analyses three primary theoretical fault lines. First, it examines the location problem, exploring how legal personhood exists metaphysically through dualist, reductionist, and sceptical frameworks. Second, it addresses the grounding problem, contrasting Legalist perspectives – which view personhood as an unconstrained, freely assignable institutional status – with Realist approaches that demand inherent ontological attributes, such as sentience or rationality, as prerequisites for recognition. Finally, it explores the identity problem through the lenses of essentialism and the Artifact Theory of Law, questioning the necessary features and functional plurality of legal personhood. Ultimately, this framework offers a crucial theoretical foundation for the conceptual reassessment required to navigate the forthcoming challenges of granting legal recognition to non-human entities.
Keywords:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This article is a part of a research project (no 2020/36/C/HS5/00600) funded by
the National Science Centre of Poland (‘Analysis of the concept of a legal person
from an ontological and linguistic perspective’).
Bibliography
Banaś P, ‘Truth and Truth-Makers in Legal Discourse’ (unpublished PhD thesis 2018)
Banaś P, ‘Why cannot anything be a legal person? A critique of Kurki’s Theory of Legal Personhood’ (2021) 44 Revus
Gindis D, ‘From Fictions and Aggregates to Real Entities in the Theory of the Firm’ (2009) 5(1) Journal of Institutional Economics 25
Grossman S and Hart O, ‘The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration’ (1986) 94(4) Journal of Political Economy 691
Hägerström A, Inquiries into the Nature of Law and Morals (K Olivecrona ed, CD Broad tr, Almqvist & Wiksell 1953)
Hart HLA, ‘Definitions and Theory in Jurisprudence’ in Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Clarendon Press 1983)
Jackson F, From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis (Oxford University Press 1998)
Jensen MC and Meckling WH, ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’ (1976) 3(4) Journal of Financial Economics 311
Jowitt J, ‘Assessing Contemporary Legislative Proposals for Their Compatibility with a Natural Law Case for AI Legal Personhood’ (2021) 36 AI & Society 499
Jowitt J, ‘Legal Rights for Animals: Aspiration or Logical Necessity?’ (2020) 11(2) Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 173
Kelsen H, General Theory of Law and State (Anders Wedberg tr, Harvard University Press 1949)
Kelsen H, Pure Theory of Law (Max Knight tr, University of California Press 1967)
Khalidi MA, Natural Categories and Human Kinds: Classification in the Natural and Social Sciences (Cambridge University Press 2013)
Khalidi MA, ‘Three Kinds of Social Kinds’ (2015) 90(1) Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96
Kramer MH, Rights and Right-Holding: A Philosophical Tract (Oxford University Press 2024)
Kurki VAJ, A Theory of Legal Personhood (Oxford University Press 2019)
Naffine N, Law’s Meaning of Life: Philosophy, Religion, Darwin and the Legal Person (Hart Publishing 2009)
Price H, Expressivism, Pragmatism and Representationalism (Cambridge University Press 2013)
Searle JR, ‘What is an institution?’ (2005) 1 Journal of Institutional Economics 1
Spaak T, ‘Legal Realism and Functional Kinds: Michael Moore’s Metaphysically Reductionist Naturalism’ (2021) 2 Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej
Toh K, ‘Hart’s Expressivism and his Benthamite Project’ (2005) 11 Legal Theory 75
Wichert RN and Nussbaum MC, ‘The Legal Status of Whales: Capabilities, Entitlements and Culture’ (2016) 37(72) Seqüência (Florianópolis) 19
Other articles from the issue
Legal Personality: Towards the Rights of Nature. Editorial
Cezary Błaszczyk, Paweł Banaś
29.06.2026
Rights of Naturelegal personhoodLatin American lawPachamamaenvironmental lawRIGHTS OF NATURE: IS THERE A LATIN AMERICAN MODEL OF THEIR RECOGNITION?
Filip Olszówka
29.06.2026
rights of naturenational parks in Polandthin rightsSCHRÖDINGER’S RIGHTS OF NATURE. THE PARADOX OF THE EARTH JURISPRUDENCE
Cezary Błaszczyk, Antoni Cypryjański
Similar publications
29.06.2026
Rights of Naturelegal personalitywatercoursesFrench lawTHE LEGAL PERSONIFICATION OF WATERCOURSES
Jacques Leroy
29.06.2026
Rights of Naturethe Mar Menor legal personalitythe Oder River legal personalityLEGAL PERSONALITY OF NATURE ELEMENTS AS A NEW INSTRUMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. INTRODUCTORY ISSUES
Jerzy Bieluk