The Concept of a Special Criminal Law as a Weapon Against “Enemies” of the Society
2016, 67, No. 1
DOI
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 314 KB
Number of views:232
Number of downloads:26
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
In Günther Jakobs’ terminology the term “Feindstrafecht” (enemy criminal law) means a special criminal law designed to fight enemies of society. Unlike traditional criminal law, it is not aimed at regular citizens but at those who deny the legal system, e.g. terrorists and organized criminals. The idea of declaring some people to be enemies of the society leads to new legal, political and philosophical questions: Who are these enemies? How can we identify them? Can these enemies be deprived of their human rights? Answers to these questions need to be found, since elements of “Feindstrafrecht” already exist in today’s criminal law.
Keywords:
Bibliography
Aponte A., Krieg und Feindstrafrecht, Baden-Baden 2004
Aponte A., Krieg und Politik − Das politische Feindstrafrecht im Alltag, “Höchstrichteriche Rechtsprechung zum Strafrecht” 2006, issue 8−9
Aust A., Handbook of International Law, 2nd ed., Cambridge 2005
Díez C. G. J., Enemy combatants versus enemy criminal law: An introduction to the European debate regarding enemy criminal law and its relevance to the Anglo-American discussion on the legal status of unlawful enemy combatants, “New Criminal Law Review” 2008, Vol. 11, No. 4
Greco L., Feindstrafrecht, Zürich 2010
Jakobs G., Bürgerstrafrecht und Feindstrafrecht, “Höchstrichterliche Rechtsprechung zum Strafrecht” 2004, issue 3
Kaufmann P., Lalissidou D., Präventivstrafrecht versus Feindstrafrecht, “Juristische Rundschau” 2016, issue 4
Lässig R. (in:), F. Höpfel, E. Ratz (eds.), Wiener Kommentar. Verbotsgesetz, 2nd ed., Wien 2015
Salinger F., Feindstrafrecht: Kritisches oder totalitäres Strafrechtskonzept?, “Juristen Zeitung” 2006
Tebbit M., Philosophy of Law, 2nd ed., New York 2005
Tomuschat C., Human Rights, Oxford 2003
Other articles from the issue
- -
Foreword
- criminal lawconstitutional lawhuman dignityguiltculpabilitycriminal liability
The Impact of Human Dignity on the Principles of Criminal Liability. The Example of Guilt
- terrorismhijacked aircraftexculpatory necessityjustifying necessityself-defenceconsent
Combating Terrorism at the Expense of Innocent People. A Criminal Law Perspective
Similar publications
- -
Foreword
- criminal lawconstitutional lawhuman dignityguiltculpabilitycriminal liability
The Impact of Human Dignity on the Principles of Criminal Liability. The Example of Guilt
- terrorismhijacked aircraftexculpatory necessityjustifying necessityself-defenceconsent
Combating Terrorism at the Expense of Innocent People. A Criminal Law Perspective