The Critique of Copyright in Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics
2016, 68, No. 1
DOI
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 429 KB
Number of views:211
Number of downloads:11
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
The accurate interpretation of Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s argumentation ethics inevitably leads to the conclusion that appropriation of creative works ought to be rejected since only tangibles can and need to be owned for artistic conceptions are ideal, not-scarce (non-excludable and non-rivalrous) objects. Moreover, their ownership would inevitably lead to a conflict over titles to their exemplars. Incorporeal rights are thus inconsistent with both the praxeological axiom and absoluteness of negative rights. Hence, an attempt to introduce “artificial scarcity” through positive copyright law is unethical. It disregards the fundamental rules of any rational ethics: universality (equality before the law) and operationality (suitability for mankind survival) because it interferes with the propertarian axiom of self-ownership and the principle of non-aggression. Therefore, a property in artistic conceptions is neither rationally feasible nor indispensable and entails self-contradiction of any deontological theory based on rules of praxeology.
Keywords:
Bibliography
Barta J. (ed.), System prawa prywatnego, Vol. 13, Prawo autorskie, Warszawa 2013
Barth E. M., Martens J. L. (eds.), Argumentation. Approaches to Theory Formation, Am-sterdam 1982
Bartyzel J., Geneza i próba systematyki głównych nurtów libertarianizmu, (in:) W. Bu¬lira, W. Gogłoza (eds.), Libertarianizm. Teoria, praktyka, interpretacje, Lublin 2010
Block W. E., Rejoinder to Murphy and Callahan on Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics, “The Journal of Libertarian Studies” 2011, Vol. 22, No. 1
Block W. E., Roads, Bridges, Sunlight and Private Property: Reply to Gordon Tullock, “Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines” 1998, Vol. 8, No. 2–3
Block W. E., Van Dun on Freedom and Property: A Critique, “Libertarian Papers” 2010, Vol. 2, No. 4
Bouckaert B., What Is Property?, “Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy” 1990, Vol. 13, No. 3
Bouillon H., A Note on Intellectual Property and Externalities, (in:) J. G. Hülsmann, N. S. Kinsella (eds.), Property, Freedom, and Society. Essays in Honor of Hans-Her¬mann Hoppe, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn 2009
Czajkowska-Dąbrowska M., Treść (elementy “struktury”) prawa autorskiego a treść prawa własności, “Studia Iuridica” 1994, Vol. XXI
Czajkowska-Dąbrowska M., Własność czy własności (intelektualne), (in:) A. Kidyba, R. Skubisz (eds.), Współczesne problemy prawa handlowego. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana prof. dr hab. Marii Poźniak-Niedzielskiej, Kraków 2007
Dominiak Ł., Aggression and Copyright, “Political Dialogues” 2014, No. 16
Dominiak Ł., Problem aksjomatyczności zasady autowłasności w filozofii politycznej li-bertarianizmu, “Athenaeum. Polskie Studia Politologiczne” 2016, Vol. 49
Drahos P., A Philosophy of Intellectual Property, 2nd ed., Ashgate, Aldershot–Burlington 2001
Eabrasu M., A Reply to the Current Critiques Formulated Against Hoppe’s Argumenta¬tion Ethics, “Libertarian Papers” 2009, Vol. 1
Faraci D., Do Property Rights Presuppose Scarcity?, “Journal of Business Ethics” 2014, Vol. 125, No. 3
Fisher W. W., Theories of Intellectual Property, (in:) S. Munzer (ed.), New Essays in the Legal and Political Theory of Property, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge–New York 2007
Friedman D. D., Standards as Intellectual Property. An Economic Approach, “University of Dayton Law Review” 1994, Vol. 19, No. 1
Gawlik B., Ochrona dóbr osobistych. Sens i nonsens tzw. praw podmiotowych osobi¬stych, “Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Prace z Wynalazczości i Ochrony Własności Intelektualnej” 1985, Vol. 41
Giesen B., Własnościowy model prawa autorskiego – analiza koncepcji przyjętej w pra¬wie polskim, “Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny” 2015, Vol. LXXVII, No. 2
Hoppe H.-H., A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Au¬burn 2010
Hoppe H.-H., Appendix: Four Critical Replies, (in:) The Economics and Ethics of Private Property. Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy, 2nd ed., Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn 2006
Hoppe H.-H., Block W. E., On Property and Exploitation, “International Journal of Va¬lue-Based Management” 2002, Vol. 15
Hoppe H.-H., Capitalist Production and the Problem of Monopoly, (in:) H.-H. Hoppe, A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn 2010
Hoppe H.-H., Economic Science and the Austrian Method, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn 2007
Hoppe H.-H., Four Critical Replies, (in:) The Economics and Ethics of Private Property. Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy, 2nd ed., Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn 2006
Hoppe H.-H., From the Economics of Laissez Faire to the Ethics of Libertarianism, (in:) W. E. Block, L. H. Rockwell, Jr. (eds.), Man, Economy, and Liberty. Essays in Honor of Murray N. Rothbard, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn 1988
Hoppe H.-H., On Praxeology and the Praxeological Foundation of Epistemology, (in:) The Economics and Ethics of Private Property. Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy, 2nd ed., Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn 2006
Hoppe H.-H., On the Ultimate Justification of the Ethics of Private Property, (in:) The Economics and Ethics of Private Property. Studies in Political Economy and Philo¬sophy, 2nd ed., Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn 2006
Hoppe H.-H., Property, Causality, and Liability, “The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics” 2004, Vol. 7, No. 4
Hoppe H.-H., Property, Contract, Aggression, Capitalism, Socialism, (in:) A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn 2010
Hoppe H.-H., Rothbardian Ethics, (in:) The Economics and Ethics of Private Property. Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy, 2nd ed., Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn 2006
Hoppe H.-H., The Economics and Ethics of Private Property. Studies in Political Econo¬my and Philosophy, 2nd ed., Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn 2006
Hoppe H.-H., The Ethical Justification of Capitalism and Why Socialism is Morally In-defensible, (in:) A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn 2010
Hoppe H.-H., The Justice of Economic Efficiency, (in:) The Economics and Ethics of Pri¬vate Property. Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy, 2nd ed., Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn 2006
Hoppe H.-H., The Ultimate Justification of the Private Property Ethic, “Liberty” 1988, No. 2
Hughes J., The Philosophy Of Intellectual Property, “Georgetown Law Journal” 1988, Vol. 77
Hülsmann J. G., Knowledge, Judgment, and the Use of Property, “The Review of Au¬strian Economics” 1997, Vol. 10, No. 1
Hülsmann J. G., The A Priori Foundations of Property Economics, “The Quarterly Jour¬nal of Austrian Economics” 2004, Vol. 7, No. 4
Hume D., Book 3: Of Morals, Part 1, (in:) F. F. Norton, M. J. Norton (eds.), Treatise of Human Nature, Clarendon Press, Oxford 2007, Vol. 1
Hume D., Book 3: Of Morals; Of the Rules, Which Determine Property, (in:) F. F. Norton, M. J. Norton (eds.), Treatise of Human Nature, Clarendon Press, Oxford 2007, Vol. 1
Illies C. F. R., The Grounds of Ethical Judgement. New Transcendental Arguments in Moral Philosophy, Clarendon Press, Oxford–New York 2003
Juruś D., Czy istnieje etyka libertariańska, “Filo-Sofija” 2015, No. 29
Juruś D., Libertariańska koncepcja własności, (in:) M. Nowak (ed.), “Studia prawnicze. Rozprawy i materiały”, Kraków 2005
Juruś D., Libertarny radykalizm, “Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna” 2014, Vol. III, No. 1
Juruś D., W poszukiwaniu podstaw libertarianizmu, Kraków 2012
Kant I., Von der Unrechtmäßigkeit des Büchernachdrucks, “Berlinische Monatsschrift” 1785, Vol. 5, No. 1
Kinsella N. S., Against Intellectual Property, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn 2008
Kinsella N. S., Law and Intellectual Property in a Stateless Society, “Libertarian Papers” 2013, Vol. 5, No. 1
Kinsella N. S., New Rationalist Directions in Libertarian Rights Theory, “Journal of Li¬bertarian Studies” 1996, Vol. 12, No. 2
Kinsella N. S., Punishment and Proportionality: The Estoppel Approach, “Journal of Li-bertarian Studies” 1996, Vol. 12, No. 1
Kinsella N. S., The Blockean Proviso, https://mises.org/blog/blockean-proviso (visited August 9, 2016)
Law and Economics (by Hans-Hermann Hoppe) – Introduction to Austrian Economics, V for Voluntary Library, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TI-RUPQ9RdA, video of a public lecture (visited August 8, 2016)
Lech P., Własnościowa koncepcja autorskich praw majątkowych – czy to ma sens?, (in:) M. Burnecka, R. Próchniak (eds.), Dynamika kultury a (r)ewolucja własności inte¬lektualnej, Vol. 1, Wrocław 2007
Locke J., Of Property, (in:) P. Laslett (ed.), Two Treatises of Government, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2003
Locke J., Second Treatise, (in:) P. Laslett (ed.), Two Treatises of Government, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2003
Lomasky L., The Argument from Mere Argument, “Liberty”, November 1989, Vol. 3
Long R. T., Easy Rider, https://aaeblog.com/2007/09/11/easy-rider/ (visited August 9, 2016)
Long R. T., The Hoppriori Argument, http://praxeology.net/unblog05-04.htm#10 (visited August 10, 2016)
Machan T., Individualism and Political Dialogue, “Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of Science and the Humanities” 1996, No. 46
Marcinkowska J., Dozwolony użytek w prawie autorskim. Podstawowe zagadnienia, “Prace Instytutu Prawa Własności Intelektualnej UJ” 2004, Vol. 87
Modrzejewska M., Libertariańskie koncepcje jednostki i państwa we współczesnej ame-rykańskiej myśli politycznej, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków 2010
Moore A. D., A Lockean Theory of Intellectual Property Revisited, “San Diego Law Review” 2012, Vol. 49
Moore A. D., Intellectual Property and Information Control: Philosophic Foundations and Contemporary Issues, 2nd ed., Transaction Publishing, New Brunswick 2004
Murphy R. P., Callahan G., Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethic: A Critique, “The Journal of Libertarian Studies” 2006, Vol. 20, No. 2
Nozick R., Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Blackwell, Oxford 1999
Oppenheimer F., Der Staat, Keip, Frankfurt am Main 1975
Osterfeld D., Comment on Hoppe, Austrian Economics Newsletter, Spring/Summer 1988
Palmer T. G., Are Patents and Copyrights Morally Justified? The Philosophy of Property Rights and Ideal Objects, (in:) A. Thierer, W. Crews (eds.), Copy Fights. The Future of Intellectual Property in the Information Age, Cato Institute, Washington 2002
Palmer T. G., Intellectual Property: A Non-Posnerian Law and Economics Approach, “Hamline Law Review” 1989, Vol. 12, No. 2
Rand A., Patents and Copyrights, (in:) A. Rand, N. Branden, A. Greenspan, R. Hessen, Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, Signet, New York 1967
Rasmussen D. B., Political Legitimacy and Discourse Ethics, “International Philosophi¬cal Quarterly” 1992, Vol. XXXII, No. 1
Rothbard M. N., Anatomy of the State, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn 2009
Rothbard M. N., Beyond Is and Ought, “Liberty” 1988, Vol. 2, No. 2
Rothbard M. N., Ethics of Liberty, New York University Press, New York–London 1998
Rothbard M. N., Man, Economy, and State. A Treatise on Economic Principles. With Po¬wer and Market. Government and the Economy, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn 2004
Sechrest L. J., Praxeology, Economics, and Law: Issues and Implications, “The Quarter¬ly Journal of Austrian Economics” 2004, Vol. 7, No. 4
Shaffer B., A Libertarian Critique of Intellectual Property, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn 2013
Steele D. R., One Muddle After Another, “Liberty” September 1987, Vol. 2
Stocker B., Hoppe: Habermas’ Anarcho-Conservative Student, at http://istanbulfactsan-dideas.blogspot.com/2009/06/hoppe-habermas-anarcho-conservative.html (visited August 12, 2016)
The Private Property Order: An Interview with Hans-Hermann Hoppe, “Austrian Econo¬mics Newsletter” 1998, Vol. 18, No. 1
Traple E., Ustawowe konstrukcje w zakresie majątkowych praw autorskich i obrotu nimi w dobie kryzysu prawa autorskiego, Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków 1990
van Dun F., Argumentation Ethics and the Philosophy of Freedom, “Libertarian Papers” 2009, Vol. 1
van Dun F., Economics and the Limits of Value-Free Science, “Reason Papers” 1986, No. 11
van Dun F., Freedom and Property: Where They Conflict, (in:) J. G. Hülsmann, N. S. Kin¬sella (eds.), Property, Freedom, and Society. Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn 2009
van Gompel S., Relativizing the Legal-Theoretical Concerns with Copyright Formalities, (in:) Formalities in Copyright Law. An Analysis of their History, Rationales and Po¬ssible Future, Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn 2011
von Hayek F. A., The Constitution of Liberty, London 1993
von Mises L., Human Action. A Treatise on Economics. The Scholar’s Edition, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn 1998
von Mises L., Theory and History. An Interpretation of Social and Economic Evolution, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn 2007
Wile A., Exclusive Interview. Dr. Hans-Hermann Hoppe on the Impracticality of One¬-World Government and the Failure of Western-style Democracy, The Daily Bell, March 27, 2011, at http://www.thedailybell.com/exclusive-interviews/anthony-wile-dr-hans-hermann-hoppe-on-the-impracticality-of-one-world-government-and-the-failure-of-western-style-democracy/ (visited August 5, 2016)
Yeager L., Raw Assertions, “Liberty” 1988, Vol. 2, No. 2
Other articles from the issue
Tables of Contents / Spis treści
- building on the someone else’s landimmobilitygood faithpossessionpropertyroman lawSupreme CourtPolandAustria
Bauen aud fremdem Boden. Eigentumserwerb durch den gutgläubigen Besitzer
- CAP reformagricultural marketquota systemexceptional support on the agricultural market
New Organization of the Agricultural Market in the European Union after the Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy after 2013
Similar publications
Tables of Contents / Spis treści
- building on the someone else’s landimmobilitygood faithpossessionpropertyroman lawSupreme CourtPolandAustria
Bauen aud fremdem Boden. Eigentumserwerb durch den gutgläubigen Besitzer
- CAP reformagricultural marketquota systemexceptional support on the agricultural market
New Organization of the Agricultural Market in the European Union after the Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy after 2013