New technologies or new human rights: the right to a government by humans and the right to one’s own thoughts?
2018, 76, No. 1
University of Warsaw
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 354 KB
Number of views:300
Number of downloads:73
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
The rapid development of information and communication technology has made it imperative that new human rights be spelled out, to cope with an array of expected threats associated with this process. With artificial intelligence being increasingly put to practical uses, the prospect arises of Man’s becoming more and more AI-dependant in multiple walks of life. This necessitates that a constitutional and international dimension be imparted to a right that stipulates that key state-level decisions impacting human condition, life and freedom must be made by humans, not automated systems or other AI contraptions. But if artificial intelligence were to make decisions, then it should be properly equipped with value-based criteria. The culture of abdication of privacy protection may breed consent to the creation and practical use of technologies capable to penetrate an individual consciousness without his or her consent. Evidence based on such thought interference must be barred from court proceedings. Everyone’s right to intellectual identity and integrity, the right to one’s thoughts being free from technological interference, is as essential for the survival of the democratic system as the right to privacy – and it may well prove equally endangered.
Keywords:
Other articles from the issue
Similar publications
29.07.2025
sex selective abortionhuman rightsdiscriminationpersonhoodSex-Selective Abortion and the Problem of Discrimination
Ewa Rejman
21.12.2025
camerasbody-worn cameraspolicesurveillancenew technologiesartificial intelligenceTHE COMPARISON OF POLISH AND GERMAN MODELS FOR THE UTILISATION OF POLICE BODY-WORN CAMERAS
Jędrzej Kupczyński
24.10.2019
Supreme People’s Court of Chinajudicial reformhuman rightsevidence rule systemNajwyższy Sąd Ludowyreforma sądowaprawa człowiekasystem dowodówThe Supreme People’s Court of China in the Process of Judicial Reform
Baosheng Zhang, Yin Li