en
Studia Iuridica

Is State Preemption Weakening the Authoritarian Resilience of Local Government in the United States?

2019, 79, No. 1

Julian C. Juergensmeyer

0000-0002-6102-8547

Georgia State University

Andrew F. Prater

0000-0002-9688-9240

Georgia State University

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0013.1892

Publication date

12.05.2019

Publishing model

open access

License type

CC BY 4.0 Int.

Field

Law

Discipline

law

Language of publication

English

Downloads

PDF 420 KB

Article

Number of views:162

Number of downloads:20

Crossref citations:0

Altmetric score:0

Abstract

In many countries in the world today democratic institutions and ideals seem threatened. Due process, equal protection, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, the right to vote, and other democratic ideals are deeply ingrained in US culture and government. Traditionally, the federal government is thought to be the guardian of these rights, ensuring that state governments adhere to the rule of law established by our written constitution. Similarly, state governments are thought to uphold these democratic ideals vis a vis local governments. The American system of checks and balances and separation of powers and the resulting interplay between the branches of government are considered safeguards that protect the rule of law. This horizontal separation of powers often overshadows the similar function served by the vertical separation of governmental power created by our division of power into federal, state and local. If the federal and state governments act contrary to the rule of law established by our federal and state constitutions, local governments offer at least some degree of authoritarian resilience. The goal of this article is to set forth the manner in which local governments may resist anti-democratic action from federal and state governments and then to discuss the danger posed in the United States by the recent increase in State preemptions of local government power – particularly in regard to sanctuary cities, climate change, gun regulation, affordable housing, and LGBT rights. Ultimately, governments at different levels are intended to monitor each other and when local governments are preempted from exercising their powers in regard to socially important issues their authoritarian resilience is seriously impaired.

Keywords:

Bibliography

Brescia R., Marshall J.T., (eds.), How Cities Will Save The World: Urban Innovation in the Face of Population Flows, Climate Change and Economic Inequality, Routledge 2016.

Briffault R., Reynolds L., Cases and Materials on State and Local Government Law, St. Paul, Mn. 2016, 8th ed.

Briffault R., The Challenge of New Preemption, “Stanford Law Review” 2018, Vol. 70.

Capps K., Preempting the Rights of North Carolina Cities to Govern Themselves, “CityLab” 29 September 2015, https://www.citylab.com/equity/2015/09/preemptingthe-right-of-north-carolina-cities-to-govern-themselves/408058/ (visited February 25, 2019)

Chau V., Yager J., Article: Zoning for Affordability: Using the Case of New York To Explore Whether Zoning Can Be Used to Achieve Income-Diverse Neighborhoods, 25 “New York University Environmental Law Journal” 2017, Vol. 1.

Cordes M.W., Thompson on Real Property § 43.04(a) 1994.

Deere S., Atlanta Mayor Bottoms Orders Jail to Refuse New ICE Detainees, “The Atlanta Journal-Constitution” 20 June 2018, https://www.ajc.com/news/breaking-news/ atlanta-mayor-bottoms-orders-jail-refuse-new-ice-detainees/iy1rtK0WmYkk3cEbv1CeDN/ (visited February 18, 2019)

El Mallakh N. I., Comment: Does the Costa-Hawkins Act Prohibit Local Inclusionary Zoning Programs?, “California Law Review” 2001, Vol. 89.

Hobbes M., Affordable Housing Problem is a Ticking Time Bomb, “The Huffington Post” 19 June 2018, https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/housing-crisis-inequality-harvard-report_us_5b27c1f1e4b056b2263c621e (visited February 18, 2019)

Juergensmeyer J.C. et al., Land use and planning and development regulation law, St. Paul, Mn. 2018.

Kupper H., The Concept of Multilayered Statehood in the System of Russian Federalism, “Review of Central and Eastern Europe Law” 2013, Vol. 38, pp. 239-266.

Litten K., Edwards J.B., Vetoes Ban on Affordable Housing Requirements for Developers, “The Times Picayune” 29 May 2018.

Lord D., What Are Sanctuary Cities? Here’s a List of Sanctuary Cities, Counties, States, “The Atlanta Journal-Constitution” 26 January 2017, https://www.ajc.com/ news/national/what-are-sanctuary-cities-here-list-sanctuary-cities-counties-states/ Y452wnIOx2hemgKx8T4gIP/ (visited February 18, 2019)

Martinez J., 1 Local Government Law §4:1 et seqq. Rochester, N.Y. 2018.

Pinedo, V.J., Note, Embracing the Excluded: Using Mandatory Inclusionary Zoning to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing in St. Louis, “Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy” 2016, Vol. 26.

Rinderle W., Norling B., The Nazi Impact on a German Village, Lexington 1994.

Schapiro R.A., How Federalism Can Promote a National Commitment to the Rule of Law, this issue.

Schraff E.A., Hyper Preemption: A Reordering of the State-Local Relationship?, “Georgetown Law Journal” 2018, Vol. 106.

Schragger R.C., State Preemption of Local Laws: Preliminary Review of Substantive Areas, Legal Efforts to Address Preemption (LEAP) Project, May 2017.

Schragger R.C., The Attack on American Cities, “Texas Law Review” 2018, Vol. 96.

Stahl K. A., Local Home Rule in the Time of Globalization, 2016 “Brigham Young University Law Review” 2016, Vol. 177.

Stevenson S. M., Antieau on Local Government Law §21.01 Newark N.J. 2009, 2nd ed.

Theriault D.C., Kate B., Signs Bill on Affordable Housing Rules, Renter Relief, “The Oregonian” 17 March 2016, https://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/03/ kate_brown_signs_bills_on_affo.html (visited February 20, 2019)

Ulloa J., Nearly $50 Million in the California State Budget Will Go to Expanded Legal Services for Immigrants, “The Los Angeles Times” 15 June 2017.

Similar publications