Is There a Room for Local and Regional Self-Government in the Illiberal Democracy? Struggle over Recentralization Attempts in Poland
2019, 79, No. 1
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 346 KB
Number of views:360
Number of downloads:96
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
Since the parliamentary elections in 2015, Poland shifted towards an illiberal model of democracy, largely inspired by the Hungarian experience. One of the first and key signs of the shift towards illiberal democracy in Hungary in the era of FIDESZ was undermining the capacities and autonomy of local governments. Taking into account the ideological proximity of the Hungarian and the Polish ruling parties, there were strong grounds to expect similar tendencies in Poland. This paper reviews the legislation adopted since 2015 in order to explore whether the supposed shift towards recentralization occurred. It proves that while a “creeping centralization” is a fact, the foundations of local and regional self-government have not been dismantled. The nature of this “creeping centralization” is sectoral rather than horizontal, i.e. it focuses on limiting the capacities and powers of local and regional governments in selected areas (particularly education and environmental protection) rather than dismantling the fundamental institutional guarantees of local and regional autonomy or enhancing central supervision over them. This may lead to a conclusion that the foundations of local and regional self-government in Poland are not at risk, yet the scope of decentralization is being gradually rolled out. This paper also demonstrates potential explanations for lack of radical shift towards recentralization. The major hypothesis analyzed in this context relates to the massive public support for local governments and decentralization, manifested in the opinion polls showing the highest trust rate to local governments in their history.
Bibliography
CBOS, Oceny działalności instytucji publicznych, Warszawa 2017.
Gendźwiłł A., Żerkowska-Białas M., Polacy o samorządach. Opinia publiczna u progu samorządowej kampanii wyborczej, Warszawa 2018.
Hajnal G., Rosta M., A New Doctrine in the Making? Doctrinal Foundations of Sub-National Governance Reforms in Hungary (2010-2014), „Administration & Society” 2019.
Katz B., Nowak J., The New Localism: How Cities Can Thrive in the Age of Populism, Washington D.C. 2017.
Ladner A., Keuffer N., Baldersheim H., Measuring Local Autonomy in 39 countries (1990–2014), “Regional & Federal Studies” 2016, issue 26(3).
Mendizabal N. C., Crisis Management, Re-Centralization and the Politics of Austerity in Spain, “International Journal of Iberian Studies” 2014, issue 27(1).
Muro D., When Do Countries Re-Centralize?: Ideology and Party Politics in the Age of Austerity, (in:) Contesting Spain? The Dynamics of Nationalist Movements in Catalonia and the Basque Country, Routledge 2015, pp. 22-40.
Perulli P., Return of the State and Attempts of Centralization in Italy, “Métropoles” 2013, issue 12.
Soos G., Dobos G., Against the Trend: Recentralization of Local Government System in Hungary, (in:) IPSA World Congress, Montreal 2014.
Swianiewicz P., An Empirical Typology of Local Government Systems in Eastern Europe, “Local Government Studies” 2014, issue 40 (2).
Swianiewicz P., Gendźwiłł A., Zardi A., Territorial Reforms in Europe: Does Size Matter?, Partnership for Good Governance 2017.
Szente Z., Hungary – Local Government in Hungary: A Creeping Centralisation?, (in:) C. Panara, M. R. Varney (eds.), Local Government in Europe: The ‘Fourth Level’in the EU Multi-Layered System of Governance, Routledge 2013.
Sześciło D., Recydywa centralizmu? Zmiany w polityce państwa wobec samorządu po 2015 roku, Warszawa 2018.
Zakaria F., The Rise of Illiberal Democracy, “Foreign Affairs” 1997, issue 22.