en
Studia Iuridica

The Consolidation of Hungarian Legal Practice with the Austrian Norms in 1861

2019, 80, No. 1

Imre Képessy

0000-0001-8388-7273

Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0013.4797

Publication date

17.09.2019

Publishing model

open access

License type

CC BY 4.0 Int.

Field

Law

Discipline

law

Language of publication

English

Downloads

PDF 289 KB

Article

Number of views:207

Number of downloads:40

Crossref citations:0

Altmetric score:0

Abstract

A few months before the suppression of the Hungarian Revolution in August 1849, Emperor Franz Joseph issued the Constitution of Olmütz, which suspended the Hungarian constitutional order. After 1850, the Viennese Government aimed to unify the legal system in the whole empire, and as part of the process, many Austrian legal norms were imposed by royal decrees upon the Hungarian territories. This led to fundamental changes in the country’s legal system (the customary law as “law in action” took precedence up until 1848), even though it happened unconstitutionally. The worsening state of affairs and the defeat in the Austro-Sardinian War led the Emperor to promulgate a new constitution which became known as the October Diploma in 1860. Accordingly, Hungary regained its former constitutional status, but Franz Joseph ordered the newly reinstated chief justice to assemble a council that should debate over the most pressing issues regarding the administration of justice. There, the most influential lawyers proposed that the Hungarian laws shall be restored – albeit with several compromises. Most members agreed that an absolute and immediate repeal of every Austrian legal norm would certainly violate the rights of the citizens. Therefore, even though this committee did not accept the validity of these laws, the majority of its members argued that some of them must remain in effect until the Parliament will reconvene. Consequently, the Austrian legal norms as “law in books” deeply influenced the “law in action” in Hungary for the years to come.

Keywords:

Bibliography

Bak M. J., Banyó P., Rady M., (eds.), The Customary Law of the Renowned Kingdom of Hungary: A Work in Three Parts Rendered by Stephen Werbõczy, M.J. Bak (transl.), Los Angeles 2005

Béli G., Magyar jogtörténet – A tradicionális jog [Hungarian Legal History – Traditional Law], Budapest–Pécs 2009

Berzeviczy A., Az abszolutizmus kora Magyarországon [The Era of Absolutism in Hungary], Budapest 1932

Bónis Gy., A Hármaskönyv [The Tripartitum], Budapest 1990

Deák I., Törvényes forradalom: Kossuth Lajos és a magyarok 1848-49-ben [Lawful Revolution, Louis Kossuth and the Hungarians in 1848-49], Budapest 1983

Gergely A., Magyarország története a 19. században [History of Hungary in the 19th Century], Budapest 2005

Kecskeméthy A., Vázlatok egy év történetéből [Outlines of History of One year], Pest 1862

Képes Gy., Az 1848-as forradalom törvényalkotása és a magyar parlamentarizmus [The Legislation of the Hungarian Revolution of 1848 and Hungarian Parliamentiarism], „Jogtudományi Közlöny” 1998, issue 4.

Képes Gy., The Birth and Youth of the Modern Hungarian Private Law, „Journal on European History of Law” 2016, issue 7

Meszer A., Országbírói Értekezlet (21. és 156. §§) és az Osztrák Polgári Törvénykönyv [Conference of the Justice of the Realm (21. and 145. §§) and the Austrian Civil Code], Budapest 1897

Mezey B., Egy jogászkarrier a 19. században. (Csemegi Károly 1826-1899) [The career of a lawyer in the 19th Century], (in:) A Praxistól a kodifikációig. Csemegi Károly emlékére (1826-1899) [From Legal Practice to Codification: In Memory of Károly Csemegi (1826-1899)], Budapest 2001

Mezey B., Horvát Boldizsár az Országbírói Értekezleten [Boldizsár Horvát on the Conference of the Justice of the Realm], „Jogtörténeti Szemle” 2005, issue 3

Mezey B., Horvát Boldizsár az 1861-es országgyűlésen [Boldizsár Horvát on the Parliament of 1861], „Jogtörténeti Szemle” 2007, issue 1

Mezey B., Magyar alkotmánytörténet [Hungarian Constitutional History], Budapest 2003

Mezey B., Magyar jogtörténet [Hungarian Legal History], Budapest 2007

Mezey B., Szuverenitáskérdések [The Issue of Sovereignty], „Jogtörténeti Szemle” 2015, issue 4

Neschwara Ch., Österreichs Recht in Ungarn, „Rechtsgeschichtliche Vorträge” 2008, issue 52

Rady M., Customary Law in Hungary. Courts, Texts, and the Tripartitum, Oxford 2015

Rady M., Nonnisi in sensu legum? Decree and Rendelet in Hungary (1790–1914), „Hungarian Historical Review” 2016, issue 1

Ráth Gy., Az országbírói értekezlet a törvénykezés tárgyában [The Conference of the Justice of the Realm in the Matter of Judiciary], Pest 1862

Roman E., Austria-Hungary and the Successor States: A Reference Guide from the Renassiance to the Present, New york 2003

Szabad Gy., Forradalom és kiegyezés válaszútján [At crossroads between revolution and compromise], Budapest 1967

Széchenyi I., Hitel [Credit], Pest 1830

Szladits K., A magyar magánjog I. [Hungarian Private Law I], Budapest, 1941

Vékás L., The Codification of Private Law in Hungary in Historical Perspective, „Annales” 2010 no. 4. https://www.ajk.elte.hu/file/annales_2010_04_Vekas.pdf (visited December 31, 2018)

Similar publications