A Civil Law Perespective on the Supreme Court and its Functions
2019, 81, No. 1
University of Ljubljana
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 707 KB
Number of views:375
Number of downloads:83
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
The text presents the issue of the Supreme Court’s functions from the perspective of civil law countries. The author argues that the division into cassation, revision and appeal is not an adequate point of reference enabling to define those functions. The author asserts that the most important criterion is whether the Supreme Court acts overwhelmingly in public or private interest. The assessment of that criterion should be made on the basis of the methods of selection of cases by the Supreme Court. What is essential is whether the selection is based on public aims or whether it simply aims at solving a given case accurately. It may be argued that as a result of reforms introduced in the last few years, the majorityof civil law countries have focusedon the implementation of the public rather than private functions. The author concludes that the public function of supreme courts is of a completely different significance than in the times of socialism. The public interest is combined with private interest as it refers to the situation of parties – not parties to the specific proceedings, but all parties which are going to engage in litigation in the future.
Keywords:
Bibliography
Adams M., van der Schyff G., Constitutional Review by the Judiciary in the Netherlands, A Matter of Politics, Democracy or Compensating Strategy?, ZaöRV 66 (2006), available at: http://www.zaoerv.de/66_2006/66_2006_2_a_399_414.pdf
Arnold R., The decisions of the German Federal Constitutional Court and their binding force for ordinary courts, paper presented at a Conference “Interrelations between the constitutional court and ordinary courts”, Baku, Azerbaijan, 9–10 November 2006 by the Venice Commission, available at: http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/ documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-JU(2006)047-e
Backer I. L., The Norwegian Reform of Civil Procedure, (in:) Procedural Law, Scandinavian Studies in Law, Vol. 51, Stockholm, 2007, available at: http://www.domstol.no/ upload/DA/Internett/domstol.no/Aktuelt/Backer.pdf (15 May 2014)
Barnert E., Vom Zufall bei der Suche nach Recht, Die Revisionszulassung durch den BGH nach der ZPO-Reform, (in:) R. M. Kiesow, D. Simon (eds.), Vorzimmer des Rechts, Vittorio Klostermann Verlag, 2006
Bobek M., Quantity or Quality? Reassessing the Role of Supreme Jurisdictions in Central Europe, “American Journal of Comparative Law” 2009, Vol. 57/1
Cadiet L., El sistema de la casacion francesa, (in:) M. Ortels Ramos, Los Recursos ante los Tribunales Supremos in Europa, Valencia: Difusion Juridica, 2008
Chiarloni S., Fundamental Tasks of the Corte di Cassazione. Heterogenous Objectives Arisen from the Constitutional Right to Appeal and Recent Reforms, (in:) M. Ortels Ramos, Los Recursos ante los Tribunales Supremos in Europa, Valencia: Difusion Juridica, 2008
Comoglio L. P., Ferri C., Taruffo M., Lezioni sul processo civile, Quinta edizione, Mulino, Bologna, 2011
De la Olivia Santos A., Spanish civil procedure act 2000: flying over common law and civil law tradition, (in:) J. Walker, O. G. Chase, Common Law, Civil Law and the Future of Categories, Lexis Nexis, 2011
Dezső M., Constitutional Law in Hungary, Kluwer, 2010
Domej T., What is an important case? Admissibility of Appeals to the Supreme Courts in the German-speaking Jurisdictions, (in:) A. Uzelac, C. H. Van Rhee, Nobody’s Perfect; Comparative Essays on Appeals and other Means of Recourse against Judicial Decisions in Civil Matters, Intersentia, 2014
Erecinski T., Entwicklung der Regelung der Kassation in Zivilsachen in Polen, (in:) L. Bittner, T. Klicka, G. E. Kodek, P. Oberhammer (eds.), Festschrift für Walter H. Rechberger zum 60. Geburtstag, Srpnger, Wien 2005
Esplugues-Mota C., Barona-Vilar S., Civil Justice in Spain, Nagoya University Comparative Study of Civil Justice, Vol. 3, 2009
Esposito G., Lanau S., Pompe S., Judicial System Reform in Italy – A Key to Growth; IMF Working Paper, 2014, available at: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2014/ wp1432.pdf (5 May 2014)
Feguš P., Revizija in zahteva za varstvo zakonitosti kot izredni pravni sredstvi v teoriji in praksi po novi procesni ureditvi, “Pravna praksa” 2009, Vol. 47
Garlicki L., Constitutional courts versus supreme courts, “International Journal of Constitutional Law” 2007, Vol. 5(1), Oxford University Press, Oxford
Gimeno Sendra J. V., The Spanish Civil Casacion: Perspectives for Reform (abridged version), (in:) M. Ortels Ramos, Los Recursos ante los Tribunales Supremos in Europa, Valencia: Difusion Juridica, 2008
Gottwald P., Review appeal to the German Federal Supreme Court after the reform of 2001, (in:) M. Ortels Ramos, Los Recursos ante los Tribunales Supremos in Europa, Valencia: Difusion Juridica, 2008
Haapaniemi P., (in:) L. Ervo (ed.), Civil Justice in Finland, Nagoya University Comparative Study of Civil Justice 2009, Vol. 2
Hammerstein Committee Report; Improving cassation procedure; Report of the Hammerstein Committee on the Normative Role of the Supreme Court, The Hague, February 2008, available at: http://www.rechtspraak.nl/Organisatie/Hoge-Raad/ Supreme-court/How-to-cope-with-the-growing-caseload-of-the-Supreme-Court/ Pages/Report-of-the-Hammerstein-Committee.aspx
Holzhammer R., Österreichisches Zivilprozessrecht, Springer 1976
Jenull, H., Kapitulacija, “Pravna praksa” 2007, Vol. 28
Jolowicz T., Appeal, Cassation, Amparo and All That: What and Why?, (in:) Estudios en homenaje al doctor Hector Fix-Zamudio en sus treinta anos como investigador de las ciencias juridicas, Tomo III: Derecho Procesal, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, 1998, available at: http://biblio.juridicas.unam.mx/libros/2/643/26.pdf (15 May 2014)
Jolowicz T., The Role of the Supreme Courts at the National and International Level, (in:) P. Yessiou-Paltsi (ed.), The Role of the Supreme Courts at the National and International Level: Reports for the Thessaloniki International Colloquium, 21–25 May 1997, Sakkoulas Publ., Thessaloniki, Athens 1998
Jolowicz T., van Rhee C. H., Recourse Against Judgments in the European Union, Kluwer Law International, 1999
Kengyel M., Harsagi V., Civil Justice in Hungary, Nagoya University Comparative Study of Civil Justice 2009, Vol. 4
Klein O., The Federal Constitutional Court’s relation to the German ordinary courts, paper presented at conference Interrelations between the constitutional court and ordinary courts, Baku, Azerbaijan, 9‒10 November 2006, European Commission for Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission); available at: ehttp://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-JU(2006)045-e (15 May 2014)
Kollmann O., Wesentliche Neuerungen der bulgarischen Zivilprozessordnung, (in:) T. Sutter-Somm, V. Harsagi (eds.), Die Entwicklung des Zivilprozessrechts in Mitteleuropa um die Jahrtausendwende, Schulthess, Zurich 2012
Komárek J., “In the Court(s) We Trust?” On the need for hierarchy and differentiation in the preliminary ruling procedure, (2007) 32 “European Law Review” 32 (4), final draft available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=982529 (5 May 2014)
Komárek, J., The struggle for legal reform after communism, Law Society and Economy Working Paper Series, WP10/2014, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/55833/1/WPS2014-10_Komarek. pdf (15 May 2014)
Kühn Z., The Authoritarian Legal Culture at Work: the Passivity of Parties and the Interpretational Statements of Supreme Courts, 2 Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy (2006), available at: http://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/ view/12/12 (15 May 2014)
Kühn Z., The Judiciary in Central and Eastern Europe: Mechanical Jurisprudence in Transformation, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011
Kühn Z., Worlds Apart: Western and Central European Judicial Culture at the Onset of the European Enlargement, “American Journal of Comparative Law” 2004 (52)
Lind S., Constitutional Review of Legislation in the Nordic Countries: the Example of Finland, Juridica, 2001, Vol. 6
Lindblom P. H., The Role of the Supreme Courts in Scandinavia, (in:) Progressiv Process – Spridda uppsatser om domstollsprocessen och samhällsutvecklingen, Uppsala: Iustus Förlag, 2000
Ljubić D., Granice ustavnog sudovanja iniciranog ustavnom tužbom, “Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu” 2013, No. 1
Maniotis D., Tsantinis S., Civil Justice in Greece, Nagoya University Comparative Study of Civil Justice 2010, Vol. 6
Meier I., Schweizerisches Zivilprozessrecht, Schulthess, Zurich 2010
Mettenheim C. von, Kant, die Moral und die Reform der Revision, “Neue Juristische Wochenschrift” 2004, Vol. 57
Orehar-Ivanc M., Institut dopuščene revizije po ZPP-D, “Pravna praksa” 2009, Vol. 28
Ortells Ramos M. (ed.), Appeals to Supreme Courts in Europe, Difusion, Juridica, Madrid 2008
Pásztor T., Constitutional complaints, The Lawyer Briefing, 28 May 2012, available at: http://www.nt.hu/_userfiles/Constitutional_Complaints_Hungary_2012.pdf
Priban J., Judicial Power vs. Democratic Representation, (in:) W. Sadurski (ed.), Constitutional Justice, East and West: Democratic Legitimacy and Constitutional Courts in Post-Communist Europe in a Comparative Perspective, Law and Philosophy Library 2003, Vol. 62. The Hague: Kluwer Law International
Prokop K., Polish Constitutional Law, Bialystok Law Books, 2011
Rechberger W. H., Simotta D. A., Zivilprozessrecht, 6. Aufl., Wien, 2003
Rijavec V., Ude L., Zakon o pravdnem postopku z novelo ZPP-D – Uvodna pojasnila, Ljubljana: GV Založba, 2008
Rosenberg L., Schwab K. H., Gottwald P., Zivilprozessrecht, 16. Aufl., 2004
Rozsnyai K., Richterliche Unabhängigkeit und die Instrumente zur Wahrung der Rechtseinheit, Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando Eötvös Nominatae – Sectio Iuridica LII: (52) pp. 179–192 (at p. 188), available at: http://www. ajk.elte.hu/file/annales_2011_17_Rozsnyai.pdf (16 May 2014)
Sadurski W., Rights Before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist states of Central and Eastern Europe, Springer, Wien 2005
Stein F., Jonas M., Zivilprozessordnung-Kommentar, 22. Aufl. 2013
Study on individual access to constitutional justice – Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 85th Plenary Session (Venice, 17–18 December 2010), available at: http://www. venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2010)039rev-e
Stürner R. H., Murray P. L., German Civil Justice, Carolina Academic Press, 2004
Svensson B., Managing the flow of appeals – Swedish experiences, Conference papers, Development of the Supreme Court of Latvia, 7 October 2005, Lindblom, 2000, p. 88, available at: www.at.gov.lv/files/docs_en/.../Svensson_eng.doc (15 May 2014)
Triva S., Belajec V., Dika M., Gradjansko parnično procesno pravo, Zagreb 1986
Ude L., Civilni pravdni postopek, Ljubljana: čZ Uradni list, 1988
Ude L., Reforma revizije in zahteve za varstvo zakonitosti, “Podjetje in delo” 2007, Vol. 6–7
Uitz R., Constitutional Courts in Central and Eastern Europe: What Makes a Question Too Political?, “Juridica International”, Tartu, 2007, Vol. XIII
Uzelac A., The need to provide reasons in court judgments: some developments in east and west, (in:) J. Gudowski, K. Weitz (eds.), Aurea Praxis Aurea Theoria – Ksiega Pamiatkova ku czci Profesora Tadeusza Erecinskiego, Tom 1, Warsaw 2011
Van Rhee C. H., Appeal in civil and administrative cases in the Netherlands, (in:) C. H. Van Rhee, A. Uzelac, Nobody’s perfect: Comparative Essays on Appeals and other Means of Recourse against Judicial Decisions in Civil Matters, Intersentia, 2014
Van Rhee C. H., Recourse against Judgments in the Netherlands, (in:) J. A. Jolowicz, C. H. Van Rhee (eds.), Recourse against Judgments in the European Union, The Hague, 1999, pp. 239–260, available at: http://arnop.unimaas.nl/show.cgi?fid=1038 (15 May 2014)
Wedam Lukić D., Ali naj bo dovoljenost revizije v diskreciji Vrhovnega sodišča, “Pravna praksa” 2007, Vol. 36
Yessiou-Paltsi P. (ed.), The Role of the Supreme Courts at the National and International Level: Reports for the Thessaloniki International Colloquium, 21–25 May 1997, Sakkoulas Publ., Thessaloniki, Athens 1998