Admissibility of Remedies Filed to the Supreme Court of the Republic of Macedonia in Civil Matters
2019, 81, No. 1
University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Faculty of Law ‘Iustinianus Primus’
University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Faculty of Law ‘Iustinianus Primus’
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Number of views:164
Number of downloads:0
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
The text provides the genesis of the existing regime for access to the highest judicial body in Macedonia, the particularities of that regime and an assessment on its effects on the judicial system. The authors provide insight into two different modes of revision in Macedonian legal system, namely the ordinary revision and the leave to file a revision, depending on the goals each of these remedies primarily strives to achieve – individual justice in a particular dispute or uniform application of law and harmonisation of the judicial practice. The text also presents the issue of granting a leave to appeal, which has a number of specificities in comparison to its German and Austrian counterparts. Finally, it offers a critical assessment of recent reforms and provides statistical data on the Supreme Court’s caseload in Macedonia.
Keywords:
Bibliography
Aliu S., Izmenite na Zakonot za parnicnata postapka (ZPP) vo odnos na revizijata [The amendments of the Civil Procedure Act (CPA) regarding the revision], Delovno pra¬vo, No. 4, Skopje 2011
Bell J., Reflections on continental European Supreme Courts, “Legal Studies” 2004, Vol. 24
Bobek M., Quantity or Quality? Reassessing the Role of Supreme Jurisdictions in Cen¬tral Europe, “The American Journal of Comparative Law” 2009, Vol. 57
Dika M., Novo uređenje revizije protiv presude [New arrangement of the revision aga¬inst the judgment], Zbornik 47 ssreta pravnika Opatija’09, Hrvatski savez udruga pravnika u gospodarstvu, Opatija, 20–22 svibnja 2009
Galić A., The Role of the Supreme Court in Creating Precedents in Slovenian civil pro¬cedure, (in:) Los recursos ante los Tribunales Supremos en Europa [Appeals to Su¬preme Courts in Europe], Barcelona 2008
Georgievski S., Kodifikacija na gradjanskoto zakonodavtsvo vo Republika Makedoni¬ja [Codification of the Civil Legislation in the Republic of Macedonia], Pravnik, No. 210, Skopje 2009
Gottwald P., Review Appeal to the German Federal Supreme Court after the Reform of 2001, (in:) Los recursos ante los Tribunales Supremos en Europa [Appeals to Su¬preme Courts in Europe], Barcelona: Difusión Jurídica y Temas de Actualidad 2008
Gović I., Revizija u svjetlu poslednih izmjena и dopuna Zakona o parničnom posupku (ZPP/03) i na njima utemeljenoj sudskoj praksi [Revision in the light of the course of the last amendments to the Civil Procedure Act (CPA/03) and the case law based on them], “Collection of papers of the Law Faculty at the University of Rijeka” 2008, Vol. 29, No. 2
Hall G., Application for leave to appeal: The Paramount Importance of Public Importan¬ce, “Advocates Quarterly” 1999, Vol. 22
Janevski A., Dozvoljenost revizije prema Zakonu o izmenama i dopunama ZPP Repu¬blike Makedonije iz 2010. godine [Admissibility of revision according to the law on amendments and modifications of the CPA of 2010], “Pravni zivot” 2011, Vol. 11
Janevski A., Zoroska-Kamilovska T., Gragansko procesno pravo, Kniga prva, Parnicno pravo, vtoro izmeneto i dopolneto izdanie [Civil Procedural Law, Book I, Litigation, Second Revised Edition], Skopje 2012
Jolowicz J.A., On civil procedure, Cambridge University Press 2000
Kerameus K., Procedural Tools in the Different European States Concerning the Uni¬form Interpretation of Law by the Supreme Courts: A Comparative Presentation, “Revue Hellénique de Droit International” 2000, Vol. 53
Lupascu D., The Appeal in the Interest of Law in the Drafts of the New Romanian Proce¬dure Codes, “Lex and Scientia International Journal” 2009, XVI. Vol. 1
Pomeranz W., Supervisory Review and the Finality of Judgments under Russian Law, “Review of Central and East European Law” 2009, Vol. 34
Prančić V., Revizija po dopuštenju drugostupanjskog suda [Revision permitted by appe¬late court], “Pravo u gospodarstvu” 2004, No. 1/04, Vol. 43
Telfer R., A Historical Comparison of Certiorari Review Standards in Florida’s Appella¬te Courts, “Stetson Law Review” 2013, Vol. 42
Triva S., Dika M., GraД‘ansko parniДЌno procesno pravo [Civil Procedural Law], Zagreb 2004
Uzelac A., Accelerating Civil Proceedings in Croatia – A History of Attempts to Improve the Efficiency of Civil Litigation, (in:) C. H. van Rhee (ed.), History of Delays in Civil Procedure, Maastricht 2004
Uzunov D., Vonredni pravni lekovi [Extraordinary remedies], Pravnik, No. 177, Skopje 2007
Velkovski V., Baranje za zaštita na zakonitosta i edinstvena primena na zakonite [Requ¬est for the protection of legality and uniform application of laws], “Sudiska revija” 2004, Year 10, No. 1
Wilson B., Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, “Advocates’ Quarterly” 1983, Vol. 4, No. 1