Intricacies of Significant Imbalance as the Cornerstone of Protection against Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts under EU Law
2019, 82, No. 1
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 648 KB
Number of views:195
Number of downloads:62
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
Significant imbalance in the rights and obligations of the parties to a consumer contract term is, together with good faith, a fundamental pillar of substantive protection against unfair terms. It is the primary tool provided by Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts with a view to mitigating differences in bargaining power between professional traders and consumer on the ever-expanding capitalistic market within the EU. The paper comprehensively reviews the meaning of the “significant imbalance” element by reference to a cross-section of judgments handed by the CJEU and Polish courts. Generally, albeit with a few notable exceptions, the former court has engaged in a subjective-objective exercise aimed at discovering what the balance of rights and obligations would have been between the parties in the particular dispute at hand had it not been for the purportedly unfair clause. Besides that, the requirement has been utilized to impose ad bolster a host of information duties levied on traders so that protection is extended to cases where the consumer is unaware of their rights or are deterred from enforcing them due to procedural obstacles or prohibitive costs of judicial or administrative proceedings. The requirement of significant balance, rooted in the idea that the disproportion of market power between the parties to a disputed term necessitates government or judicial intervention to achieve or restore contractual equilibrium, is shown from a plethora of angles: its ideological foundations, practical connotations, its emphasis on consumer vulnerability and approach to economic power. Assistance and inspiration re gleaned from Polish jurisprudence where numerous questions either unanswered by the CJEU or left to the consideration of national courts, particularly the relation between reasonableness, on the one hand, and significant imbalance and good faith on the other, as well as between significant imbalance and good faith, have been tackled.
Keywords:
Bibliography
Basedow J., The Court of Justice and Private Law: Vacillations, General Principles and the Architecture of the European Judiciary, “European Review of Private Law” 2010, Vol. 18, issue 3
Becher S. I., Asymmetric Information in Consumer Contracts: The Challenge That Is Yet to Be Met, “American Business Law Journal” 2008, Vol. 45, issue 4
Bednarek M., (in:) E. Łętowska (ed.), System Prawa Prywatnego. Tom 5. Prawo zobowiązań – część ogólna, Warszawa 2012
Belohlávek A. J., B2C Arbitration: Consumer Protection in Arbitration, Huntington 2012
Cafaggi F., On the Transformations of European Consumer Enforcement Law: Judicial and Administrative Trialogues, Instruments and Effects, (in:) F. Cafaggi, S. Law (eds.), Judicial Cooperation in European Private Law, Cheltenham 2017
Cafaggi F., Self-Regulation in European Contract Law, “European Journal of Legal Studies” 2007, Vol. 1, issue 1
Czech T., Efektywność instrumentów prawnych ochrony kredytobiorcy konsumenta w świetle orzecznictwa sądowego, „Prawo w Działaniu” 2014, issue 20
Devenney J. P., Gordian Knots in Europeanised Private Law: Unfair Terms, Bank Charges and Political Compromises, “Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly” 2011, Vol. 62, issue 1
Doliwa K., Dobra wiara jako wyrażenie języka prawnego, „Monitor Prawniczy” 2008, issue 6
Fauvarque-Cosson B., Mazeaud D., European Contract Law: Materials for a Common Frame of Reference: Terminology, Guiding Principles, Model Rules, Berlin 2008
Gillies L. E., Electronic Commerce and International Private Law: A Study of Electronic Consumer Contracts, London 2016
Gutman K., The Constitutional Foundations of European Contract Law: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford 2014
Hejbudzki M., Klauzule odmowy realizacji złożonego przez konsumenta zamówienia w transakcjach typu business to consumer, (in:) M. Królikowska-Olczak, B. Pachuca Smulska (eds.), Ochrona prawna konsumenta na rynku mediów elektronicznych, Warszawa 2015
Hogg M., Arnokouros G., Pinna A., Cascão R., Watterson S., ECJ C-240/98 – C-244/98, 27 June 2000, (Océano Grupo Editorial and Salvat Editores) Scottish Case Note, “European Review of Private Law” 2002, Vol. 10, issue 1
Howells G., Durovic M., The Rise of EU Consumer Law between Common Law and Civil Law Legal Traditions, (in.) F. de Elizalde (ed.), Uniform Rules for European Contract Law?: A Critical Assessment, Oxford 2018
Kenny M., The Law Commissions’ 2012 Issues Paper on Unfair Terms: Subverting the System of ‘Europeanized’ Private Law?, “European Review of Private Law” 2013, issue 3
King D. B., Standard Form Contracts: A Call for Reality, “St. Louis University Law Journal” 2000, issue 44
Kocot W. J., Odpowiedzialność przedkontraktowa, Warszawa 2013
Lapuente S. C., A Critical Analysis of the CJUE Judgment of 21 December 2016: Retroactive Nullity Yes, but Not Unfair Transparency Test of Floor Clauses, “Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional” 2017, Vol. 9, issue 1
Lazić V., Procedural Justice for ‘Weaker Parties’ in Cross-Border Litigation under the EU Regulatory Scheme, “Utrecht Law Review” 2014, Vol. 10, issue 4
Lehmann K., Glosa do wyroku s. apel. z dnia 15 lutego 2013 r., VI ACa 1113/12, „Monitor Prawa Bankowego” 2014, issue 3
Leśniak D., Sienicka E., Zmiany ubezpieczeniowych funduszy kapitałowych w trakcie trwania umowy ubezpieczenia na życie. Wybrane zagadnienia, „Prawo Asekuracyjne” 2013, issue 3
Mak C., Gutiérrez Naranjo – On Limits in Law and Limits of Law (August 30, 2017). Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No. 2017-38; Centre for the Study of European Contract Law Working Paper Series No. 2017-06
Mak C., On Beauty and Being Fair – The Interaction of National and Supranational Judiciaries in the Development of a European law on Remedies, (in:) K. Purnhagen, P. Rott (eds.), Varieties of European Economic Law and Regulation: Liber Amicorum for Hans Micklitz, Berlin 2014
Mańko R., The Use of Extra-Legal Arguments in the Judicial Interpretation of European Contract Law: A Case Study on Aziz v Catalunyacaixa (CJEU, 14 March 2013, Case C-415/11), “Law and Forensic Science” 2015, Vol. 10, issue 2
Merciai P., Consumer Protection and the United Nations, “Journal of World Trade Law” 1986, Vol. 20, issue 2
Niglia L., The Rules Dilemma – The Court of Justice and the Regulation of Standard Form Consumer Contracts in Europe, “Columbia Journal of European Law” 2006, Vol. 13, issue 1
Oponowicz A., Niedozwolone postanowienia wzorców umów zawieranych z konsumentami – zmienne tendencje w polskim orzecznictwie sądowym, „Internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny” 2014, issue 4
Pavillon C., ECJ 26 October 2006, Case C-168-05 Mostaza Claro v. Centro Movil Milenium SL – The Unfair Contract Terms Directive: The ECJ’s Third Intervention in Domestic Procedural Law, “European Review of Private Law” 2007, issue 5
Paxford B., Wyrok SA z dnia 15 lutego 2013 r., VI ACa 1113/12, „Monitor Prawniczy” 2014, issue 6
Pereda Á., Corbacho M., Spain: consumer protection – floor clauses, “Journal of International Banking Law and Regulation” 2017, Vol. 32, issue 9
Pertíñez Vílchez F., La incompatibilidad con la Directiva 93/13 de la limitación temporal de los efectos restitutorios vinculados a la declaración judicial del carácter abusivo de una cláusula contractual. Comentario de la sentencia de 21 diciembre 2016, Gutiérrez Naranjo, “Revista Europea de Derecho Comunitario” 2017, issue 57
Piers M., Consumer Arbitration in the EU: A Forced Marriage with Incompatible Expectations, “Journal of International Dispute Settlement” 2011, Vol. 2, issue 1
Poillot E., The European Court of Justice and General Principles Derived from the Acquis Communautaire, “Oslo Law Review” 2014, issue 1
Reich N., A European Contract Law, or an EU Contract Law Regulation for Consumers?, “Journal of Consumer Policy” 2005, Vol. 28, issue 4
Rott P., Unfair Contract Terms, (in:) C. Twigg-Flesner (ed.), Research Handbook on EU Consumer and Contract Law, Cheltenham 2016
Rott P., What is the Role of the ECJ in EC Private Law – A Comment on the ECJ Judgments in Oceano Grupo, Freiburger Kommunalbauten, Leitner and Veedfald, “Hanse Law Review” 2005, Vol. 1, issue 1
Rymanowska-Mrugała K., Dostosowanie prawa polskiego w zakresie niedozwolonych klauzul w umowach konsumenckich do regulacji unijnej, „Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis” 2014, Vol. 316, issue 1
Sarmiento D., An Instruction Manual to Stop a Judicial Rebellion (before it is too late, of course), 2 February 2017, https://verfassungsblog.de/an-instruction-manual-to-stop-a-judicial-rebellion-before-it-is-too-late-of-course/
Sein K., Protection of Consumers against Unfair Jurisdiction and Arbitration Clauses in Jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice, “Juridica International 2011”, Vol. XVIII
Skory M., Klauzule abuzywne w polskim prawie ochrony konsumenta, Kraków 2005
Spencer E. C., The Applicability of Unfair Contract Terms Legislation to Franchise Contracts, “University of Western Australia Law Review” 2013, Vol. 37, issue 1
Straetmans, G. Cauffman C., Legislatures, courts and the Unfair Terms Directive, (in:) P. Syrpis (ed.), The Judiciary, the Legislature and the EU Internal Market, Cambridge 2012
Twigg-Flesner C., The Europeanisation of Contract Law: Current Controversies in Law, London 2013
Valcke C., Convergence and Divergence Between the English, French and German Conceptions of Contract, University of Toronto Faculty of Law, Legal Studies Research Series, No. 08-14
Whittaker S., Judicial Interventionism and Consumer Contracts, “Law Quarterly Review” 2001, issue 117
Wieczorek E., Art. 3851, (in:) M. Glicz, M. Serwach (eds.), Prawo ubezpieczeń gospodarczych. Komentarz. Tom II. Prawo o kontraktach w ubezpieczeniach. Komentarz do przepisów i wybranych wzorców umów, Warszawa 2010
Yuthayotin S., Access to Justice in Transnational B2C E-Commerce: A Multidimensional Analysis of Consumer Protection Mechanisms, Berlin 2013
Other articles from the issue
- US military lawUS military historyinternational law of warwar crimesamerykańskie prawo wojennehistoria militarna Stanów Zjednocoznychmiędzynarodowe prawo wojnyzbrodnie wojenne
The Reluctant Warrior: the Challenge to Instilling Law of War Values in Today’s Professional Warrior
W. Chadwick Austin, Shawn D. McKelvy
- patient’s rightsmedical informationtherapeutic relationshipthe medical professional-patient relationshipPatients’ Rights Ombudsmanprawa pacjentainformacja medycznarelacja terapeutycznarelacja pacjent‒ lekarzRzecznik Prawa Pacjenta
Patient Rights Within the System of Legal Aid. A Starting Point Towards Medical Anthropology
Adriana Sylwia Bartnik, Błażej Kmieciak, Katarzyna Julia Kowalska
- legal educationUkraineteaching approachescorruption in educationlegal education modelIndependent External Evaluationlegal professionedukacja prawniczaUkrainapodejścia do nauczaniakorupcja w edukacjimodel edukacji prawniczejNiezależna Zewnętrzna Ewaluacjazawód prawniczy
Problems of Legal Education Reform in Ukraine
Maria Bilak