en
Studia Iuridica

End User Rights, Equal Treatment of Traffic, and Compatibility of Zero Tariff Offers with the Open Internet Access Regulation. CJEU Telenor Judgment in CASES C-807/18 and C-39/19 – A Case Comment

2021, 88, No. 1

Andrzej Nałęcz

0000-0003-0553-2084

University of Warsaw

DOI

10.31338/2544-3135.si.2021-88.13

Publication date

13.12.2021

Publishing model

open access

License type

CC BY 4.0 Int.

Field

Law

Discipline

law

Language of publication

English

Downloads

PDF 326 KB

Article

Number of views:73

Number of downloads:23

Crossref citations:0

Altmetric score:0

Abstract

This case comment concerns the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Telenor case. The CJEU responded to a request for a preliminary ruling by the Budapest High Court, which related to the use of zero tariff offers in commercial practices and agreements on internet access services. Zero tariffs consist in the traffic generated by specific applications or services not counting towards deductions in an end user’s data allowance in a given billing period. The CJEU came to the conclusion that such offers are incompatible with Article 3(3) of Regulation 2015/2120 on open internet access, if they involve traffic management measures blocking or slowing down all internet content other than the content subject to a zero tariff, once an end user’s data allowance has been exhausted. Finding this incompatibility does not require an assessment of the scale of the practice, and its influence on end user rights. Such an assessment would be necessary to establish incompatibility with Article 3(2) of Regulation 2015/2120. However, finding incompatibility with Article 3(3) makes it possible for national regulatory authorities to refrain from analyzing incompatibility with Article 3(2).

Keywords:

Bibliography

Belli L., De Filippi P., General Introduction: Towards a Multistakeholder Approach to Network Neutrality, (in:) L. Belli, P. De Filippi (eds.), Net Neutrality Compendium: Human Rights, Free Competition and the Future of the Internet, Cham 2016

BEREC Guidelines on the Implementation by National Regulators of European Net Neutrality Rules, Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC), BoR (16) 127, August 2016, https://berec.europa.eu/eng/document_register/subject_matter/berec/regulatory_best_practices/guidelines/6160-berec-guidelines-on-the-implementation-by-national-regulators-of-european-net-neutrality-rules (accessed: 30.05.2021)

Fetzer T., Net Neutrality in Europe after the Net Neutrality Regulation 2015/2120, (in:) G. Knieps, V. Stocker (eds.), The Future of the Internet: Innovation, Integration and Sustainability, Baden-Baden 2019

Krämer J., Peitz M., A fresh look at zero-rating, “Telecommunications Policy” 2018, Vol. 42, No. 7

Marsden C. T., Better Regulation of Net Neutrality: A Critical Analysis of Zero Rating Implementation in India, the United States and the European Union, (in:) L. Belli (ed.), Net Neutrality Reloaded: Zero Rating, Specialized Service, Ad Blocking and Traffic Management, Rio de Janeiro 2016

Mobile and Fixed Broadband Prices in Europe 2019, European Commission 2020, (accessed: 30.05.2021).

https://doi.org/10.2759/946134

Piątek S., Rozporządzenie UE Nr 2015/2120 w zakresie dostępu do otwartego internetu, Warszawa 2017

Varma S., Internet Congestion Control, Amsterdam 2015

Wu T., Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination, “Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law” 2003, Vol. 2