DRUG POSSESSION, CHILEAN INDIGENOUS PEOPLES, AND CULTURAL DEFENSES
2023, 96, No. 1
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 331 KB
Number of views:69
Number of downloads:17
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
This paper examines two decisions in which the legal dispute was focused on whether it was lawful to possess coca leaves by indigenous peoples to practice rituals according to their traditional customs. Both ILO Convention 169 (ILO C169) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) were paramount in justifying a cultural defence.
Keywords:
Bibliography
Broeck J. van, Cultural Defence and Culturally Motivated Crimes (Cultural Offences), 'European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice' 2001, Vol. 9(1)
https://doi.org/10.1163/15718170120519282
Cespedes R., The Influence of International Law on the Chilean Legal System: More than just Pinochet, 'Queen Mary Law Journal' 2013, No. 3
Constitution of the Republic of Chile of 1980, as amended
Fernández Gonzáles M. A., La aplicación por los tribunales chilenos del derecho internacional de los derechos humanos, 'Estudios Constitucionales' 2010, Vol. 8
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52002010000100016
Graham L. M., Reconciling Collective and Individual Rights: Indigenous Education and International Human Rights Law, 'UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs' 2010, Vol. 15(1)
Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention (No. 169), International Labour Organization, 27 June 1989 (ILO C169)
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), United Nations GA Resolution 2200A (XXI), 16 December 1966
IWHC and LAHC v Prosecutor's Office of Calama, Writ of annulment, Rol No. 250-2007 (30.11.2007), Court of Appeal of Antofagasta (Chile)
Parque Eólico Chiloé, Comunidad Indígena Antú Lafquén de Huentetique v Corema de la Región de los Lagos, Writ of protection, ILDC 2800 (CL 2012), Rol No. 10.090-2011 (22.03.2012), Supreme Court (Chile)
Pentassuglia G., Minorities in International Law: An Introductory Study, Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing 2002
Tamanaha B. Z., Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global, 'Sydney Law Review' 2008, Vol. 30(3)
UN Human Rights Committee, CCPR General Comment No. 22: Article 18 (Freedom of Thought, Conscience or Religion), 30 July 1993, CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.4, adopted at the forty-eighth session of the HRC
UN Human Rights Committee, CCPR General Comment No. 23: Article 27 (Rights of Minorities), 8 April 1994, CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.5, adopted at the fiftieth session of the HRC
Velázquez Zambrana v Prosecutor Office of Arica, RUC No. 1410018700-1, RIT No. 27-2015 (02.03.2015), Arica y Parinacota Criminal Trial Court (Tribunal Penal Oral) (Chile)
Other articles from the issue
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- indigenous lawRuledifférendLacanian psychoanalysisdiscoursebody
THE INDIGENOUS SUBJECT IN LAW: AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CARTESIAN SUBJECTIVITY AND THE RULE
- indigenous peoplesCatholic social thoughtcanon lawself-determinationInnocent IVPaulus Vladimiri
THE EVOLUTION OF PAPAL SOCIAL THOUGHT ON INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
Similar publications
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- indigenous lawRuledifférendLacanian psychoanalysisdiscoursebody
THE INDIGENOUS SUBJECT IN LAW: AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CARTESIAN SUBJECTIVITY AND THE RULE
- indigenous peoplesCatholic social thoughtcanon lawself-determinationInnocent IVPaulus Vladimiri
THE EVOLUTION OF PAPAL SOCIAL THOUGHT ON INDIGENOUS PEOPLES