FREEDOM OF RELIGION IN THE EUROPEAN PUBLIC SPACE. REMARKS BASED ON THE LATEST CASE LAW OF SELECTED INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL COURTS CONCERNING RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS
2023, 96, No. 1
Radca prawny
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 364 KB
Number of views:118
Number of downloads:65
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
The author attempts to analyse selected rulings of the European courts concerning religious symbols in order to answer the question whether freedom of religion is still respected in Europe. The analysis is based on the reflection on the context of contemporary European cultural landscape: diversity of constitutional models of particular states, the concept of neutrality in the matter of religion, and the ability of contemporary political elites and judges to understand the sphere of the sacred (sacrum). The selection criteria for the rulings have been cases concerning objects related to practising religion: (i) the hijab – an Islamic headscarf, (ii) the burqa – a garment covering practically the entire body, and (iii) the crucifix hung on a classroom wall. The review brings up important questions about lack of tolerance, pluralism and acceptance of religious diversity in contemporary Europe, and ‘reasonable accommodation’ as a possible solution.
Bibliography
Alicino F., Il crocifisso nelle aule scolastiche alla luce di Sezioni Unite 24414/2021. I risvolti pratici della libertà, Diritti Comparati, 11 November 2021, https://www.diritticomparati.it/il-crocifisso-nelle-aule-scolastiche-alla-luce-di-sezioni-unite-24414-2021-i-risvolti-pratici-della-liberta/ (accessed 02.11.2022)
Belcacemi and Oussar v Belgium, Application no. 37798/13, ECtHR judgment of 11 July 2017
Belgian decree of 7 July 2017 amending the Law of 14 August 1986 on the protection and welfare of animals, regarding permitted methods of slaughtering animals, Belgisch Staatsblad, 18 July 2017, p. 73318
C‑157/15, Samira Achbita v G4S Secure Solutions NV, CJEU judgment of 14 March 2017
C-336/19, Centraal Israëlitisch Consistorie van België and Others v Vlaamse Regering, CJEU judgment of 17 December 2020
Corte Suprema di Cassazione, sentenza n. 24414: affissione del crocifisso nelle scuole pubbliche, 9 September 2021
European Parliament resolution of 11 March 2021 on the declaration of the EU as an LGBTIQ Freedom Zone (2021/2557(RSP)), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0089_EN.html (accessed 02.11.2022)
Eweida and Others v The United Kingdom, Applications nos 48420/10, 59842/10, 51671/10 and 36516/10, ECtHR judgment of 15 January 2013
Faull J., Weiler J. H. H., EU Judges Have ‘Koshered a Pig’ in Order to Allow Shechitah Ban, ‘The Jewish Chronicle’, 16 June 2022, https://www.thejc.com/lets-talk/all/eu-judges-have-’koshered-a-pig’-in-order-to-allow-shechitah-ban-1WagcJQzfcXZjJMCiIN3jc (accessed 02.11.2022)
Joined Cases C-804/18 and C-341/19, IX v WABE eV and MH Müller Handels GmbH v HJ, CJEU judgment of 15 July 2021
Lautsi and Others v Italy, Application no. 30814/06, ECtHR judgment of 18 March 2011
Loi n° 2010-1192, French law of 11 October 2010 prohibiting concealment of one’s face in public space, https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/download/pdf?id=EEpKbOqpVKS_j-RgGEAkJZzKY6oT0Ac8uyatwTORrks= (accessed 02.11.2022)
Morawski L., ‘Zjednoczeni w różnorodności’ – dwie wizje integracji europejskiej, (in:) C. Mik (ed.), Konferencja – Unia Europejska: zjednoczeni w różnorodności, Warszawa, 14–15 grudnia 2010 r., Warszawa 2012
S.A.S. v France, Application no. 43835/11, ECtHR judgment of 1 July 2014
Szczepankiewicz-Rudzka E., Zasada laickości V Republiki Francuskiej i jej implikacje prawno-polityczne, ‘Politeja’ 2020, Vol. 17(1/64), (accessed 02.11.2022)
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.17.2020.64.05
Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, adopted by the European Council, signed in Rome on 29 October 2004 (not ratified)
Weiler J. H. H., Chrześcijańska Europa. Konstytucyjny imperializm czy wielokulturowość? Poznań 2003
Weiler J. H. H., Je Suis Achbita!, ‘European Journal of International Law’ 2017, Vol. 28(4)
Other articles from the issue
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- indigenous lawRuledifférendLacanian psychoanalysisdiscoursebody
THE INDIGENOUS SUBJECT IN LAW: AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CARTESIAN SUBJECTIVITY AND THE RULE
Jakub Babuśka
- indigenous peoplesCatholic social thoughtcanon lawself-determinationInnocent IVPaulus Vladimiri
THE EVOLUTION OF PAPAL SOCIAL THOUGHT ON INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
Dobrochna Bach-Golecka