Theoretical Underpinnings of the Doctrine of Transferred Malice
2016, 67, No. 1
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 344 KB
Number of views:346
Number of downloads:89
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
Mistaken identity and bad aim have been traditionally accepted as the two textbook situations where the doctrine of transferred malice has found application. By reference to a cross-section of academic sources as well as case law from a number of common law jurisdictions, three core elements of transferred malice are identified: the intent of the defendant, the consequence that befalls the unintended victim, and public intuitions with regard to resulting harm. The overarching conclusion of the considerations consists in reaffirming the role of factual contingencies in deciding cases as well as the existence of a significant policy element which has caused, the paper submits, judges to subsume under the umbrella term of transferred malice cases which could satisfactorily be explained by means of other legal concepts, most notably remoteness, foreseeability or negligence.
Bibliography
Allen M. J., Textbook on Criminal Law, Oxford 2015
Ashworth A. J., Transferred Malice and Punishment for Unforeseen Consequences, (in:) P. R. Glazebrook (ed.), Reshaping the Criminal Law – Essays in Honor of Glanville Williams, London 1978
Bohlander M., Transfer of Defences, (in:) A. Reed, M. Bohlander (eds.), General Defences in Criminal Law: Domestic and Comparative Perspectives, London, New York 2016
Bohlander M., Transferred Malice and Transferred Defenses: a Critique of the Traditional Doctrine and Arguments for a Change In Paradigm, “New Criminal Law Review” 2010, Vol. 13, No. 3
Card R., Molloy J., Card, Cross and Jones Criminal Law, Oxford 2016
Child J., Ormerod D., Smith and Hogan’s Essentials of Criminal Law, Oxford 2015
Eldar S., The Limits of Transferred Malice, “Oxford Journal of Legal Studies” 2012, issue 32(4)
Heaton R., de Than C., Criminal Law, Oxford 2011
Horder J., Transferred Malice and the Remoteness of Outcomes from Intentions, (in:) J. Horder (ed.), Homicide and the Politics of Law Reform, Oxford 2012
Horder J., Transferred Malice and the Remoteness of Unexpected Outcomes from Intentions, “Criminal Law Review” 2006
LaFave W. R., LaFave’s Criminal Law, 5th (Hornbook Series), St. Paul 2010
Martin J., Storey T., Unlocking Criminal Law, London 2015
Molan M., Bloy D., Lanser D., Modern Criminal Law: Fifth Edition, London, Sydney, Portland 2013
Molan M., Cases & Materials on Criminal Law, London, Sydney, Portland 2005
Monaghan N., Criminal Law Directions, Oxford 2014
Moore M. S., Intention as a Marker of Moral Culpability and Legal Punishability, (in:) R. A. Duff, S. Green (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law, Oxford 2013
Morris H. (ed.), Freedom and Responsibility: Readings in Philosophy and Law, Stanford 1961
Ormerod D., Hooper A. (eds.), Blackstone’s Criminal Practice, Oxford 2011
Richardson J. (ed.), Archbold: Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice, London 2011
Robinson P. H., Darley J. M., Intuitions of Justice: Implications for Criminal law and Justice Policy, “Southern California Law Review” 2007, Vol. 81, No. 1
Seneviratne M., Pre-Natal Injury and Transferred Malice: The Invented Other, „The Modern Law Review” 1996, Vol. 59, issue 6
Smith J. C. (ed.), Smith and Hogan’s Criminal Law, London 1992
Smith J. C., Laird K., Ormerod D., Hogan B. (eds.), Smith and Hogan’s Criminal Law, Oxford 2015
Storey T., Lidbury A., Criminal Law, London, New York 2012
Tebbit M., Philosophy of Law: An Introduction, Hove 2005
Westen P., The Significance of Transferred Intent, “Criminal Law and Philosophy” 2013, Vol. 7, issue 2
Williams G., Criminal Law: The General Part, 2nd ed., London 1961
Williams G., Textbook of Criminal Law, 2nd ed., London 1983
Williams G., The Mental Element in Crime, Jerusalem 1965
Other articles from the issue
- -
Foreword
Krzysztof Szczucki, Valeri Vachev
- criminal lawconstitutional lawhuman dignityguiltculpabilitycriminal liability
The Impact of Human Dignity on the Principles of Criminal Liability. The Example of Guilt
Krzysztof Szczucki
- terrorismhijacked aircraftexculpatory necessityjustifying necessityself-defenceconsent
Combating Terrorism at the Expense of Innocent People. A Criminal Law Perspective
Jutta Taferner
Similar publications
28.02.2024
mens reaintentnegligenceartificial intelligenceAIself-drivingautonomous vehicletraffic offencesCriminal liability of self-driving vehicles under hungarian criminal law
Máté Hodula
17.01.2019
English criminal lawcriminal complicityjoint enterprise liabilityJogee; Ruddockmens reaangielskie prawo karneprzestępne współdziałaniejoint enterprise liabilityorzeczenie w sprawie Jogee; Ruddockstrona podmiotowaOdpowiedzialność karna za przestępne współdziałanie w prawie angielskim po wyroku R v. Jogee; Ruddock v. The Queen
Piotr Brzostek
05.12.2016
prohibited actmens reaintentional character of an offenceunintentional character of an offenceguiltact committed while being in justifiable error as to a circumstance constituting a feature of an prohibited actArtykuł 28 § 1 k.k. po nowelizacji z dnia 20 lutego 2015 r. Uwagi na temat konieczności oddzielania strony podmiotowej czynu zabronionego od winy
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski

