Theoretical Underpinnings of the Doctrine of Transferred Malice

2016, 67, No. 1

Piotr Sitnik

DOI

Publication date

24.01.2017

Publishing model

open access

License type

CC BY 4.0 Int.

Field

Law

Discipline

law

Language of publication

English

Downloads

PDF 344 KB

Article

Number of views:230

Number of downloads:22

Crossref citations:0

Altmetric score:0

Abstract

Mistaken identity and bad aim have been traditionally accepted as the two textbook situations where the doctrine of transferred malice has found application. By reference to a cross-section of academic sources as well as case law from a number of common law jurisdictions, three core elements of transferred malice are identified: the intent of the defendant, the consequence that befalls the unintended victim, and public intuitions with regard to resulting harm. The overarching conclusion of the considerations consists in reaffirming the role of factual contingencies in deciding cases as well as the existence of a significant policy element which has caused, the paper submits, judges to subsume under the umbrella term of transferred malice cases which could satisfactorily be explained by means of other legal concepts, most notably remoteness, foreseeability or negligence.

Keywords:

Bibliography

Allen M. J., Textbook on Criminal Law, Oxford 2015

Ashworth A. J., Transferred Malice and Punishment for Unforeseen Consequences, (in:) P. R. Glazebrook (ed.), Reshaping the Criminal Law – Essays in Honor of Glanville Williams, London 1978

Bohlander M., Transfer of Defences, (in:) A. Reed, M. Bohlander (eds.), General Defences in Criminal Law: Domestic and Comparative Perspectives, London, New York 2016

Bohlander M., Transferred Malice and Transferred Defenses: a Critique of the Traditional Doctrine and Arguments for a Change In Paradigm, “New Criminal Law Review” 2010, Vol. 13, No. 3

Card R., Molloy J., Card, Cross and Jones Criminal Law, Oxford 2016

Child J., Ormerod D., Smith and Hogan’s Essentials of Criminal Law, Oxford 2015

Eldar S., The Limits of Transferred Malice, “Oxford Journal of Legal Studies” 2012, issue 32(4)

Heaton R., de Than C., Criminal Law, Oxford 2011

Horder J., Transferred Malice and the Remoteness of Outcomes from Intentions, (in:) J. Horder (ed.), Homicide and the Politics of Law Reform, Oxford 2012

Horder J., Transferred Malice and the Remoteness of Unexpected Outcomes from Intentions, “Criminal Law Review” 2006

LaFave W. R., LaFave’s Criminal Law, 5th (Hornbook Series), St. Paul 2010

Martin J., Storey T., Unlocking Criminal Law, London 2015

Molan M., Bloy D., Lanser D., Modern Criminal Law: Fifth Edition, London, Sydney, Portland 2013

Molan M., Cases & Materials on Criminal Law, London, Sydney, Portland 2005

Monaghan N., Criminal Law Directions, Oxford 2014

Moore M. S., Intention as a Marker of Moral Culpability and Legal Punishability, (in:) R. A. Duff, S. Green (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law, Oxford 2013

Morris H. (ed.), Freedom and Responsibility: Readings in Philosophy and Law, Stanford 1961

Ormerod D., Hooper A. (eds.), Blackstone’s Criminal Practice, Oxford 2011

Richardson J. (ed.), Archbold: Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice, London 2011

Robinson P. H., Darley J. M., Intuitions of Justice: Implications for Criminal law and Justice Policy, “Southern California Law Review” 2007, Vol. 81, No. 1

Seneviratne M., Pre-Natal Injury and Transferred Malice: The Invented Other, „The Modern Law Review” 1996, Vol. 59, issue 6

Smith J. C. (ed.), Smith and Hogan’s Criminal Law, London 1992

Smith J. C., Laird K., Ormerod D., Hogan B. (eds.), Smith and Hogan’s Criminal Law, Oxford 2015

Storey T., Lidbury A., Criminal Law, London, New York 2012

Tebbit M., Philosophy of Law: An Introduction, Hove 2005

Westen P., The Significance of Transferred Intent, “Criminal Law and Philosophy” 2013, Vol. 7, issue 2

Williams G., Criminal Law: The General Part, 2nd ed., London 1961

Williams G., Textbook of Criminal Law, 2nd ed., London 1983

Williams G., The Mental Element in Crime, Jerusalem 1965