A quest for consistency in the law of commercial agency. Loss of the right to remuneration in Polish and European law
2017, 71, No. 1
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 394 KB
Number of views:142
Number of downloads:19
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
In a recent judgment in ERGO Poist’ovňa, a.s. v Alžbeta Barlíková, the Court of Justice of the European Union attempted to clarify the ambit of Article 11 of Council Directive of 18 December 1986 on the coordination of the laws of the Member States relating to self-employed commercial agents, that is the circumstances where a commercial agent’s right to remuneration may be extinguished should a negotiated transaction not be executed between the principal and the client. Notably, the Court held that in the event of even partial non-execution of a negotiated contract between the principal and the third party client, provided it happened due to no fault on the part of the principal, the agent’s right to commission is proportionately extinguished. The paper discusses the judgment in the light of previous CJEU case law and the Polish transposition of the said European standards with a view to finding any potential divergences between the two. The paper notes two problems. First, Polish law, as opposed to Slovak law, does not recognize an automatic termination of an insurance contract in the event of default on the part of the customer. Conversely, whether such an effect eventuates is left to contractual discretion of the parties. Second, Polish courts have been recently willing to substitute unjust enrichment for contractual liability even where, it appears, complainants have valid claims under Article 7614 of the Civil Code.
Keywords:
Bibliography
Baskind E., Osborne G., Roach L., Commercial Law, Oxford 2016
Bennett H. N., Principles of the Law of Agency, Oxford 2013
Bidziński M., Jagiełło D. (eds.), Prawo gospodarcze – zagadnienia wybrane, Warszawa 2016
Dobson A. P., Stokes R., Commercial Law, London 2012
Engelmann J., International Commercial Arbitration and the Commercial Agency Directive: A Perspective from Law and Economics, Berlin 2017
Gniewek E. (ed.), Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz, Warszawa 2016
Górny K., Art. 761, (in:) M. Gutowski (ed.), Kodeks cywilny. Tom II. Komentarz do art. 450–1088, Warszawa 2016
Hesselink M. W. [et al.], Commercial Agency, Franchise and Distribution Contracts, Berlin 2006
Jezioro J., Art. 7614, (in:) E. Gniewek (ed.), Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz, Warszawa 2016
Kruczalak K., Rott-Pietrzyk E., Zapadka P., Rozdział 8, (in:) S. Włodyka (ed.), System Prawa Handlowego. Tom 5. Prawo umów handlowych, Warszawa 2011
Law J., Martin E. A. (eds.), A Dictionary of Law, Oxford 2013
Mikłaszewicz P., Art. 758, (in:) K. Osajda (ed.), Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz. Tom IIIB. Zobowiązania. Część szczegółowa. Ustawa o terminach zapłaty, Warszawa 2017
Mikłaszewicz P., Art. 7614, (in:) K. Osajda (ed.), Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz. Tom IIIB. Zobowiązania. Część szczegółowa. Ustawa o terminach zapłaty, Warszawa 2017
Munday R., Agency: Law and Principles, Oxford 2010
Mycko-Katner I., Umowa agencyjna, Warszawa 2012
Rott-Pietrzyk E., Agent handlowy – regulacje polskie i europejskie, Warszawa 2005
Rott-Pietrzyk E., (in:) J. Rajski (ed.), System Prawa Prywatnego. Tom 7. Prawo zobowiązań – część szczegółowa, Warszawa 2011
Ryder N., Griffiths M., Singh L., Commercial Law: Principles and Policy, Cambridge 2012
Watts P. G. (ed.), Bowstead & Reynolds on Agency, London 2016
Wiśniewski T., Umowa agencyjna według kodeksu cywilnego, Warszawa 2001
Wojtaszek-Mik E., Umowa agencji w dyrektywie o przedstawicielach handlowych na tle orzecznictwa Europejskiego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości, “Europejski Przegląd Sądowy” 2006, issue 1
Żygadło A., Wynagrodzenie agenta za wykonywanie czynności outsourcingowych, “Monitor Prawa Bankowego” 2011, issue 3