en

The Numerus Clausus Issue in Property Law – European Private Law and the Polish Perspective

2019, 82, No. 1

University of Warsaw

University of Warsaw, Faculty of Law and Administration


Publication date

02.03.2020

Publishing model

open access

License type


Field

Law

Discipline

law

Language of publication

English

Downloads

PDF 453 KB

Article

Number of views:403

Number of downloads:96

Crossref citations:0

Altmetric score:0


Abstract

The numerus clausus of property rights indicates that a mandatory closed catalogue of property rights exists in a given legal system; the content (method of creation, conveyance, expiration) of a right falling within this closed list is strictly specified and cannot be changed by the parties. In this way, the state consciously limits the activity of the parties in this regard, indicating the socially and legally acceptable types of property rights they can use. An insightful look at the development and explanation of this principle over the centuries and now seems to be necessary with the advancing unification of private law in Europe. The present article discusses the dogmatic basis of the concept of numerus clausus and outlines its history and economic reasoning behind it. Then, the main models of the numerus clausus in European legal orders as well as the functioning of this principle in Polish property law are presented. Subsequently, the strengths and weaknesses of the numerus clausus are examined. This provides us with general conclusions concerning the harmonization of this area of private law.

Keywords:

Bibliography

Akkermans B., The Numerus Clausus of Property Rights, (in:) M. Graziadei, L. Smith (eds.), Comparative Property Law. Global Perspectives, Cheltenham–Northampton 2017

Akkermans B., The Principle of Numerus Clausus in European Property Law, Antwerp–Oxford 2008

Antoniuk J. R., Dopuszczalność obciążenia użytkowania wieczystego służebnością przesyłu, „Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne” 2017, Vol. XV, issue 1

Dajczak W., Giaro T., Longchamps de Bérier F., Prawo rzymskie. U podstaw prawa prywatnego, Warszawa 2012

Drozd E., „Numerus clausus” praw rzeczowych, (in:) S. Sołtysiński (ed.), Problemy kodyfikacji prawa cywilnego (studia i rozprawy). Księga pamiątkowa ku czci profesora Zbigniewa Radwańskiego, Poznań 1990

Füller J. T., Eigenständiges Sachenrecht?, Tübingen 2006

Grebieniow A., Prawo rzeczowe, (in:) J. Kosonoga (ed.), Studia i Analizy Sądu Najwyższego. Przegląd Orzecznictwa. Rok 2017, Warszawa 2018 [forthcoming]

Hansmann H., Kraakman R., Property, Contract, and Verification: The Numerus Clausus Problem and the Divisibility of Rights, Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics and Business Discussion Paper Series 10/2002, paper 388

Hardin G., The Tragedy of the Commons, “Science” 1968, Vol. 162, issue 3859

Heller M. A., The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets, “Harvard Law Review” 1998, Vol. 111, No. 3

Lenel O., Das Edictum Perpetuum. Ein Versuch zu seiner Wiederherstellung, Leipzig 1927

Machnikowski P., Ogólne wiadomości o prawie rzeczowym, (in:) Gniewek E. (ed.), System Prawa Prywatnego. Tom 3. Prawo rzeczowe, Warszawa 2013

Merrill T. W., Smith H. E., Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle, “The Yale Law Journal” 2000, Vol. 110, No. 1

Mirow M. C., Globalizing Property: Incorporating Comparative and International Law into First-Year Property Classes, “Journal of Legal Education” 2004, Vol. 54, No. 2

Naworski M. J., Glosa do postanowienia SN z dnia 27 października 2004 r., IV CK 271/04, „Rejent” 2005, No. 12

Parisi F., The Fall and Rise of Functional Property, George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper, No. 05-38

Pyziak-Szafnicka M., Prawo podmiotowe, (in:) M. Safjan (ed.), System Prawa Prywatnego. Tom 1. Prawo cywilne – część ogólna, Warszawa 2012

Radwański Z., Zagadnienia ogólne czynności prawnych, (in:) Radwański Z. (ed.), System Prawa Prywatnego. Tom 2. Prawo cywilne – część ogólna, Warszawa 2008

Rudden B., Economic Theory v. Property Law: The Numerus Clausus Problem, (in:) J. Bell, J. Eekelaar (eds.), Oxford Essays on Jurisprudence. Third series, Oxford 1987

Rudnicki S., Glosa do postanowienia SN z dnia 27 października 2004 r., IV CK 271/04, OSP 2005, No. 5

Scott S. P. (ed. and trans.), The Civil Law, Cincinnati 1932, https://droitromain.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/Anglica/D8_Scott.htm (accessed: 27.07.2018)

Smits J., The Making of European Private Law: Towards a Ius Commune Europaeum as a Mixed Legal System, Antwerp–Oxford–New York 2002

van Erp S., A Numerus Quasi-Clausus of Property Rights as a Constitutive Element of a Future European Property Law, “Electronic Journal of Comparative Law” 2003, 7/2

van Erp S., European Property Law: A Methodology for the Future, (in:) R. Schulze, H. Schulze-Nölke, European Private Law – Current Status and Perspectives, Munich 2011

Von Bar Ch., The Numerus Clausus of Property Rights: A European Principle?, (in:) L. Gullifer, S. Vogenauer (eds.), English and European Perspectives on Contract and Commercial Law. Essays in Honour of Hugh Beale, Oxford–Portland 2014

Act of 6 December 1996 on Registered Pledges and the Register of Pledges (Journal of Laws 1996, No. 149, item 703)

Act of 6 July 1982 on Land and Mortgage Registers and on Mortgage (Journal of Laws 1982, No. 19, item 147)

Act of 15 December 2000 on Housing Cooperatives (Journal of Laws 2001, No. 4, item 27)

Act of 23 April 1964 – Civil Code (Journal of Laws 1964, No. 16, item 93)

Decision of the Supreme Court of 8 June 2017, V CSK 259/16 (LEX No. 2352168)

Decision of the Supreme Court of 12 November 1997, I CKN 321/97 (LEX No. 50520)

Decision of the Supreme Court of 27 October, IV CK 271/04 (LEX No. 147751)

Judgment of the Supreme Court of 3 April 2009, II CSK 470/08 (LEX No. 599755)

Resolution of the Supreme Court (seven judges) of 16 May 2017, III CZP 101/16 (LEX No. 2284273)

Similar publications