ABANDONMENT OF A THING: THE LEGAL CONSTRUCTION AND THE POSSIBILITY TO EXERCISE THIS RIGHT IN POLISH LAW
2022, 91, No. 1
University of Warsaw
University of Warsaw, Faculty of Law and Administration
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 340 KB
Number of views:67
Number of downloads:44
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
The article is intended to show, using the examples from Polish law, how strongly the owner’s right to abandon a thing is limited. First of all, the legal structure of the abandonment and its current, very universal legal form are presented. Next, some categories of things that cannot be abandoned in Polish law are distinguished, and further examples of relevant private and public law regulations are provided. Finally, the conclusion is drawn that, despite the granted right to abandon a thing, it is usually not problematic to abandon only completely safe things of low economic value.
Keywords:
Bibliography
Danecka D., Radecki W., Ustawa o odpadach. Komentarz, LEX/el. 2020
Dybowski T., Ochrona własności w polskim prawie cywilnym (rei vindicatio – actio negatoria), Warszawa 1969
Gniewek E., Nabycie i utrata własności, (in:) E. Gniewek (ed.), Prawo rzeczowe. Vol. 3. System prawa prywatnego, Legalis 2013
Jarosz-Żukowska S., Konstytucyjna zasada ochrony własności, Kraków 2003
Kępiński J., Komentarz do Art. 180, (in:) M. Gutowski (ed.), Kodeks cywilny. Vol. 1. Komentarz do Art. 1–352, LEX/el. 2018
Kondek J. M., Czy możliwe jest zrzeczenie się własności nieruchomości?, „Studia Iuridica” 2010, Vol. 52
Księżak P., Komentarz do Art. 180, (in:) K. Osajda (ed.), Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz, Legalis 2018
Księżak P., Rzeczy niczyje, „Rejent” 2005, No. 4
Matuszczak M., Prawo własności odpadów komunalnych, „Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny” 2014, No. 5
https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2014.76.3.9
Orlicki M., Komentarz do Art. 140, (in:) M. Gutowski (ed.), Kodeks cywilny. Vol. 1. Komentarz do Art. 1–352, LEX/el. 2018
Projekt prawa rzeczowego, uchwalony w pierwszym czytaniu przez Podkomisję Prawa Rzeczowego Komisji Kodyfikacyjnej, book 1, Warszawa 1937
Romano S., Studi sulla derelizione nel diritto romano. Con una “nota di lettura” di Lelio Lantella, “Rivista di Diritto Romano” 2002, No. II
Rudnicki J., Gdzie szukać rzeczy niczyich, czyli do czego służy kodeks cywilny, „Forum Prawnicze” 2014, No. 25
Sztyk R., Zrzeczenie się własności nieruchomości, „Rejent” 1999, No. 2
Trentmann F., Empire of Things. How We Became a World of Consumers, from the Fifteenth Century to the Twenty-First, 2016
Other articles from the issue
- European Green DealBiodiversity Strategy for 2030building environmental resiliencethe 8th General Union Environment Action Programme for 2030green oathCOVID-19 contextEU biodiversity protection legally binding law
THE EU BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY FOR 2030: BUILDING NATURE RESILIENCE IN THE WAKE OF THE POST PANDEMIC COVID-19 SOCIOECONOMIC RECOVERY
Maria Magdalena Kenig-Witkowska
- closed sessionadministrative courtsCovid-19principle of opennessConvention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
LIMITATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF OPENNESS IN POLISH JUDICIAL-ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PANDEMIC AND THE STANDARDS OF A FAIR HEARING: THE REASONS FOR POSSIBLE COMPLAINTS BROUGHT BEFORE THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Weronika Szafrańska
- crisis of biodiversitylegal solutions to the redistributive function of public financesbiodiversity strategyagriculturequality security
LEGAL SOLUTIONS CONCERNING THE REDISTRIBUTIVE FUNCTION OF PUBLIC FINANCE AS A TOOL TO SUPPORT BIODIVERSITY
Monika Żuchowska-Grzywacz, Piotr Kobylski