en
Studia Iuridica

Sexual harassment in a university setting: Searching for justice and compassion in an unjust and indifferent world

2021, 90, No. 1

Marie A. Failinger

0000-0001-8874-6162

Mitchell Hamline School of Law

DOI

10.31338/2544-3135.si.2022-90.8

Publication date

27.06.2022

Publishing model

open access

License type

CC BY 4.0 Int.

Field

Law

Discipline

law

Language of publication

English

Downloads

PDF 364 KB

Article

Number of views:63

Number of downloads:41

Crossref citations:0

Altmetric score:0

Abstract

The article deals with the question concerning legal responses to sexual harassment – whether those responses should be relentless in punishing and stigmatizing perpetrators and banishing them from positions where they can offend further, or whether there should be room for rehabilitating or even forgiving at least those offenders whose abusive behavior is not violent or serial. On the one hand, the importance of achieving justice and equality for women is critical. On the other hand, one may recognize the possibility of repentance and restoration of both victim and offender to society. The modern restorative justice movement, informed by Christian theology, suggests that alternative dispute resolution mechanisms should not only ensure that victims receive appropriate restoration for the harm they have suffered, but also try to restore perpetrators who accept responsibility for their offenses back into the community. It seems that practiced in the right cases, restorative justice may turn the disempowerment and fearful, sometimes guilty in-turning that victims may experience in adjudicative processes, into a freedom of giving beyond justice, and they may move the self-justificatory shame of a perpetrator into true repentance and reparatory action. At least, restorative justice may push them toward a relational dynamic that is healthier for both whether they must necessarily encounter each other in the future or free themselves from the hurt of the past.

Keywords:

sexual harassment,#Me Too movement,restorative justice,feminism,Christian feminism,molestowanie seksualne,ruch #Ja też,sprawiedliwość naprawcza,feminizm,chrześcijański feminizm

Bibliography

Chamallas M., Introduction to feminist legal theory, Aspen Publishers 2003

Comte-Sponville A., A small treatise on the great virtues: The uses of philosophy in everyday life, C. Temerson (transl.), Metropolitan Books 2001

Estrich S., Rape, “Yale Law Journal” 1986, Vol. 95, p. 1087

https://doi.org/10.2307/796522

Koss M., Restorative justice for acquaintance rape and misdemeanor sex crimes, (in:) J. Ptacek (ed.), Restorative justice and violence against women, New York 2010, p. 218

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195335484.003.0010

Levit N., Verchick R.R.M., Feminist legal theory: A primer, New York 2006

Preston C., Deconstructing equality in religion, (in:) M.A. Failinger, E.R. Schiltz, S.J. Stabile (eds.), Feminism, law, and religion, New York 2014, p. 25

Redfern B.J., Hope and reconciliation with grief, (in:) J.P.J. Dussich, J. Schellenberg (eds.), The promise of restorative justice: New approaches for criminal justice and beyond, London 2010, p. 232

Zehr H., Changing lenses: A new focus for crime and justice, Herald Press 1990

Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976)

Berman M., “I forgive you”. Relatives of Charleston church shooting victims address Dylann Roof, “Washington Post” 19 June 2015, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2015/06/19/i-forgive-you-relatives-of-charleston-church-victims-address-dylann-roof/ (accessed 1.11.2019)

Botham Jean’s brother hugs Amer Guyger after murder sentence, ABC Eyewitness News 3 October 2019, https://abc13.com/former-cop-embraced-by-victims-brother-after-murder-sentence/5586186/ (accessed 1.11.2019)

Brown S., Mangan K., What you need to know about the proposed Title IX Regulations, “The Chronicle of Higher Education” 16 November 2018, https://www.chronicle.com/article/What-You-Need-to-Know-About/245118 (accessed 27.11.2019)

Camera L., Education Department begins sweeping rewrite of Title IX sexual misconduct rules, “U.S. News” 7 June 2021, https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2021-06-07/education-department-begins-sweeping-rewrite-of-title-ix-sexual-misconduct-rules (accessed 21.05.2022)

Families advocating for campus equality, https://www.facecampusequality.org/ (accessed 1.11.2019)

Jackson C., Acting assistant secretary for civil rights, Dear Colleague Letter, 22 September 2017, https://www.cmu.edu/title-ix/colleague-title-ix-201709.pdf (accessed 5.12.2019)

Koumpilova M., School officials walk fine line as they let disciplined professors return to classroom, “Star Tribune” 20 October 2019, A1, A10, http://www.startribune.com/minnesota-campuses-look-to-rehabilitation-for-sanctioned-faculty/563461072/ (accessed 4.12.2019)

Nicolaou E., Smith C.E., A #MeToo timeline to show how far we’ve come – & how far we need to go, “Refinery 29”, 21 October 2019, at 2, https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2018/10/212801/me-too-movement-history-timeline-year-weinstein (accessed 28.10.2019) (including a timeline of celebrities accused of sexual harassment or assault from 2017–2019)

Pilcher J., How sexual harassment starts on campus: One student’s story, Cincinnati.com/The Enquirer, 2 April 2018, https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/your-watchdog/2018/04/02/how-sexual-harassment-starts-campus-one-students-story/452882002/ (accessed 31.10.2019)

Williamsen K.M., “The exact opposite of what they need”: Administrator reflections on sexual misconduct, the limitations of the student conduct response, and the possibilities of restorative justice, University of Minnesota Dissertation, 2017, https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/190564/Williamsen_umn_ 0130E_18323.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed 27.11.2019)

Similar publications