en
Studia Iuridica

CREDITORS’ SATISFACTION, FAIR DISTRIBUTION, OR AVOIDING THE STRUGGLE FOR SURVIVAL – WHICH PUBLIC INTERESTS IS CORPORATE INSOLVENCY LAW SUPPOSED TO SERVE?

2023, 98, No. 1

Carsten Schirrmacher

0000-0002-1554-898X

Philipps University of Marburg

DOI

10.31338/2544-3135.si.2023-98.12

Publication date

30.09.2023

Publishing model

open access

License type

CC BY 4.0 Int.

Field

Law

Discipline

law

Language of publication

English, Polish

Downloads

PDF 325 KB

Article

Number of views:133

Number of downloads:67

Crossref citations:0

Altmetric score:0

Abstract

For a long time, insolvency proceedings were understood as a special civil law procedure with the aim of maximizing creditor satisfaction. To the extent that public interests played a role in this, it was a matter of giving preferential treatment to particular groups of creditors. This was expected to contribute to the realization of sociopolitical values. For good reasons, such values are receiving less and less consideration in insolvency law. Instead, it has been recognized that proper structuring of the legal relationship between the debtor company and its creditors is likely to minimize macroeconomic damage in the public interest. This has led to a substantial change in the objectives of insolvency law, which – especially thanks to the Restructuring Directive (2019/1023/EU) – has arrived in all European legal systems. This article traces the paradigm shift and shows, using the example of German and Polish insolvency law, that despite having its foundations in European law, it has not yet been fully internalized in the legal systems of all Member States.

Keywords:

insolvency and restructuring,Restructuring Directive,privileged creditors,macroeconomic efficiency

Bibliography

Baird D. G., Jackson T. H., Cases, Problems and Materials on Bankruptcy, Boston 1985

Casey A. J., Chapter 11's Renegotiation Framework and the Purpose of Corporate Bankruptcy, Columbia Law Review 2020 (Vol. 120), No. 7

Cavallini C., Gaboardi M., Towards a Transnational Model of Bankruptcy Law, UC Davis Business Law Journal 2023 (Vol. 23), No. 1

Chemerinsky E., In Defense of Equality: A Reply to Professor Westen, Michigan Law Review 1983 (Vol. 81), No. 3

https://doi.org/10.2307/1288510

Décamps, J.-P., Faure-Grimaud, A., Bankruptcy Costs, Ex Post Renegotiation and Gambling for Resurrection, Finance 2000 (Vol. 21), No. 2

Eidenmüller H., Reformperspektiven im Restrukturierungsrecht, Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (ZIP) 2010 (Vol. 26), No. 14

Eidenmüller H., What is an Insolvency Proceeding?, American Bankruptcy Law Journal 2018, Vol. 92, No. 1

Eidenmüller H., What Can Restructuring Laws Do?, European Business Organization Law Review 2023 (Vol. 24), No. 2

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-023-00271-9

Finch V., The Measures of Insolvency Law, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1997 (Vol. 17), No. 2

https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/17.2.227

Finch V., Milman D., Corporate Insolvency Law, 3rd ed., Cambridge 2017

https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139626811

Hirt H. C., The Wrongful Trading Remedy in UK Law: Classification, Application and Practical Significance, European Company and Financial Law Review 2004 (Vol. 1), No. 1

https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr.2004.1.1.71

Jackson T. H., Bankruptcy, Non-Bankruptcy Entitlements, and the Creditors' Bargain, Yale Law Journal 1982 (Vol. 91), No. 5

https://doi.org/10.2307/796070

Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H., Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics 1976 (Vol. 5), No. 4

https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Kirstein H.-J., Ausführungen zur real existierenden Situation bei Eröffnungs- und Befriedigungsquoten in Insolvenzverfahren, Zeitschrift für das gesamte Insolvenz- und Sanierungsrecht (ZInsO) 2006 (Vol. 9), No. 18

Kirstein H.-J., Der früh beginnende und lang anhaltende Todeskampf juristischer Personen - Ein Erfahrungsbericht aus der Praxis, Zeitschrift für das gesamte Insolvenz- und Sanierungsrecht (ZInsO) 2008 (Vol. 11), No. 3

Moustaira E., International Insolvency Law, Athens 2019

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04450-3

Obenchain R. Roman Law of Bankruptcy, Notre Dame Law Review 1928 (Vol. 3), No. 4

Ooghe H., de Prijcker S., Failure processes and causes of company bankruptcy: A typology, Management Decision 2008 (Vol. 46), No. 2

https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740810854131

Pape G., InsO § 13 (in:) Kübler B., Prütting H., Bork R., Jacoby F. (eds.), Kommentar zur Insolvenzordnung, 95th ed., Cologne 2023

Paulus C., Die "Aufgabe" des Insolvenzrechts, Zeitschrift für Restrukturierung und Insolvenz (ZRI) 2022 (Vol. 3), No. 2

Picker R. C., Voluntary Petitions and the Creditors' Bargain, University of Cincinnati Law Review 1992/1993 (Vol. 61)

Ponoroff L., The Resiliency of the Equality of Creditors Ethos in Bankruptcy, American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review 2022 (Vol. 30), No. 1

Rivera A., Dynamic Moral Hazard and Risk-Shifting Incentives in a Leveraged Firm, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 2020 (Vol. 55), No. 4

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109019000826

Skeel Jr. D. A., The Empty Idea of "Equality of Creditors", University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2018 (Vol. 161), No. 3

Tallen M., Kuglarz P., (Vor-)insolvenzliche Sanierungsverfahren - Ein Vergleich zwischen dem polnischen und dem deutschen Recht, Osteuroparecht 2016 (Vol. 62), No. 2

https://doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2016-2-239

Wegener D., § 14 (in:) W. Uhlenbruck, H. Hirte (eds.), Insolvenzordnung, 15th ed., Munich 2019

Weiss L. A., Bankruptcy resolution. Direct costs and violation of priority of claims, Journal of Financial Economics 1990 (Vol. 27), No. 2

https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90058-8

Yu Z., An Analysis of the Multiple Aims of Insolvency Law: From the Internal and External Perspectives, Law & Economy 2022 (Vol. 1), No. 5

https://doi.org/10.56397/LE.2022.12.04

Zezulková Vitková C., Zezulka O., Preventive Restructuring: Business Viability in Impending Insolvency, (in:) N. Grmelová (ed.), Perspectives of Law in Business and Finance, Prague 2023