WOMEN’S EQUALITY: THE FINAL REDEMPTION

2023, 99, No. 1

Franciscan University of Steubenville


Publication date

03.02.2024

Publishing model

open access

License type


Field

Law

Discipline

law

Language of publication

English

Downloads

PDF 494 KB

Article

Number of views:72

Number of downloads:35

Crossref citations:0

Altmetric score:0


Abstract

The aim of this paper is to correct a historical error, one that I will argue is at the heart of the contemporary feminist movement: the ancient claim, grounded in a flawed understanding of the reproductive act, that woman is inferior to man. I will show that the lineage of this can be traced as far back as the pre-Socratic philosophers, finally finding its earliest concrete expression in a claim most have either dismissed, forgotten, or never heard: Aristotle’s argument that women are merely “malformed males” and are therefore “inferior to man”. The theory found support in the first century with a historical interpretation of Genesis 2:18-23, traceable in particular to the Hellenistic Jewish philosopher, Philo (BC 13-AD 54). Philo’s own theory about woman echoed that of Aristotle’s; his legacy includes the vague feeling that Scripture itself declares that, since woman is created after man, she is necessarily subservient to him. She becomes, as it were, the “second sex”. The combination of Aristotle and Philo proved too persuasive even for the mind of St. Thomas Aquinas and the theory accelerated and then spread through the university system inaugurated during the Middle Ages, subsequently informing the social structures and norms of Western civilization, going mostly unchallenged throughout human history, silently persisting even into the present time. This error represents what can be called a chronic “wound” in our intellectual tradition. And it is a wound that must be healed. I argue that the antidote is to correct this account and that it can be defeated on its own terms. Through the lens of Hebraic and Aristotelian-Thomistic anthropology, and building on the insights of St. John Paul II, I provide a robust, philosophically and theologically grounded account of man and woman from within the Catholic exegetical tradition, showing that man and woman are both equally human, equally endowed with intellect, will, and freedom while at the same time reflecting two different ways of being in the world.

Keywords:

Bibliography

Allen P., The Concept of Woman, Vol. 1: The Aristotelian Revolution, 750 B.C. - A.D., Grand Rapids 1997

Allen P., The Concept of Woman Vol II: The Early Humanist Reformation 1250-1500, Grand Rapids 2002

Allen P., The Concept of Woman, Vol III: The Search for Communion of Persons, 1500-2015, Grand Rapids 2016

Alter R., Genesis: Translation and Commentary, New York 1997

American Psychological Association Guidelines. Psychological Practice with Boys and Men August 2018, https://www.apa.org/about/policy/boys-men-practice-guidelines.pdf

Aquinas Thomas, De Ente et Essentia (transl. by A Maurer), Rome 1968

Aquinas Thomas, Summa Contra Gentiles: Vol. II (transl. by J. F. Anderson), South Bend 1976

https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvpj74rh

Aquinas Thomas, De veritate (transl. by R. Mulligan, J. V. McGlynn), Indianapolis 1994

Aquinas Thomas, Summa Theolgiae (transl. by Benzinger Brothers), New York 1947

Aristotle, The Generation of Animals (transl. by A. L. Peck), Cambridge 1942

https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.aristotle-generation_animals.1942

Aristotle, Parts of Animals, (transl. by W. Heinemann), Cambridge-London 1937

https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.aristotle-parts_animals.1937

Aristotle, The Basic Works of Aristotle, R. McKeon, (ed.), New York 1941

Atkinson J., Biblical and Theological Foundations of the Family: The Domestic Church, Washington 2017

Augustine, On Nature and Grace, Beloved Publishing 2014

Botterweck G. J., Ringgren H., Fabry H. J. (eds.), Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, Grand Rapids 2003

Benedict XVI, Regensburg Address, https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/regensburg-university-address-12-september--pope-benedict-xvi-6183

Childs B. S., Old Testament Theology in a Canonical Context, Philadelphia 1985

Combs M. B., 'A Measure of Legal Independence': The 1870 Married Women's Property Act and the Portfolio Allocations of British Wives, "The Journal of Economic History" 2005, Vol. 65, No. 4, pp. 1028-1057

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050705000392

Cortest L., Philo's Heirs: Moses Maimonides and Thomas Aquinas, Academic Studies Press 2017

De Beauvoir S., The Second Sex (transl. by H. M. Parshley), New York 1989

Engels F., Origins of the Family, Private Property, and the State, Zurich: 1884, https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1884/origin-family/ch02d.ht.

Finley J., The Metaphysics of Gender: A Thomistic Approach, "The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review" 2015, Vol. 79, No. 4, pp. 585-614

https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.2015.0031

Friedan B., The Feminine Mystique, New York 1963

John Paul II, Man and Woman He Created Them: The Theology of the Body, M. Waldstein (ed.), Boston 2006

Jordan-Young R., Brainstorm, Cambridge 2010

Kingma B., van Marken Lichtenbelt W., Energy consumption in buildings and female thermal demand, "Nature Climate Change", August 2015, https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate2741.epdf

https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2741

Moir A., Jessel D., Brain Sex: The Real Difference Between Men and Women, New York 1991

Philo, Questions and Answers on Genesis (transl. by R. Marcus), Cambridge 1953

Savin-Williams R. C., Psychology Today https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/sex-sexuality-and-romance/201908/toxic-femininity

Ratzinger J., Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the Collaboration of Men and Women in the Church and in the World, 2004.https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20040731_collaboration_en.html

Rhoades S. E., Taking Sex Differences Seriously, San Francisco 2004

Savage D., Redeeming Woman: A Response to the Second Sex Argument from within the Catholic Exegetical Tradition, Special Issue "The Journal of Religions" Feminism from the Perspective of Catholic Theology September 2020, https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/9/474.33;

https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11090474

Scholer D. M., The Works of Philo, (transl. by C.D. Yonge), Massachusetts 1993

Siglioto S., Rejecting Toxic Masculinity Isn't an Attack on Men, "Public Discourse: The Journal of the Witherspoon Institute" January 2019 https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2019/01/48967/

Similar publications