en
Studia Iuridica

Legal Meaning as a Shared Enterprise: The Judiciary-Scholarship Dynamic Through the Lens of the Social Division of Linguistic Labour

2025, 106, No. 1

Maciej Kruk

0000-0002-9980-5364

University of Warsaw, Faculty of Law and Administration

DOI

10.31338/2544-3135.si.2025-106.8

Publication date

29.07.2025

Publishing model

open access

License type

CC BY 4.0 Int.

Field

Law

Discipline

law

Language of publication

Polish, English

Downloads

PDF 402 KB

Article

Number of views:76

Number of downloads:57

Crossref citations:0

Altmetric score:0

Abstract

Scholarly discussions on legal interpretation often centre on methodological approaches rather than the diverse actors who contribute to shaping legal meaning. This article refocuses attention from interpretive techniques to the agents involved in meaning-making, arguing that legal interpretation is a collaborative effort among multiple contributors. Building on Hilary Putnam’s theory of the social division of linguistic labour, the paper offers a conceptual framework for understanding the distributed nature of legal interpretation. At the heart of this discussion is the interaction between legal academia and the judiciary, demonstrating how academic discourse often informs judicial decision-making, thereby reinforcing a collective enterprise in the making of legal meaning. While this study offers only an initial and illustrative account, it opens several promising avenues for future research. These include empirical inquiries into how academic arguments influence judicial reasoning, the interpretive role of legal practitioners in specialized and innovative domains, and the broader inclusion of corporate and non-institutional actors in the legal-linguistic community. Ultimately, the article argues that legal meaning should be understood not as the product of a single institutional voice, but as the outcome of a dynamic and socially distributed epistemic process.

Keywords:

Bibliography

Alexy R and Dreier R, 'Statutory Interpretation in the Federal Republic of Germany' in D Neil MacCormick and Robert S Summers (eds), Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study (1st edn, Ashgate 1991, republished Routledge 2016)

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315251905-2

Bankowski Z and MacCormick DN, 'Statutory Interpretation in the United Kingdom' in D Neil MacCormick and Robert S Summers (eds), Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study (1st edn, Ashgate 1991, republished Routledge 2016)

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315251905-10

Barrett AC, 'Substantive Canons and Faithful Agency' (2010) 90 Boston University Law Review 109

Bix BH, 'Can Theories of Meaning and Reference Solve the Problem of Legal Determinacy?' (2003) 16 Ratio Juris 281 < >

https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9337.00237

Braun A, 'Professors and Judges in Italy: It Takes Two to Tango' (2006) 26 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 665 < >

https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gql025

Brink DO, 'Legal Theory, Legal Interpretation, and Judicial Review' (1988) 17 Philosophy and Public Affairs 105

Canale D and Poggi F, 'Pragmatic Aspects of Legislative Intent' (2019) 64(1) American Journal of Jurisprudence 125 < >

https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/auz003

Ekins R, The Nature of Legislative Intent (OUP 2012)167

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646999.001.0001

Fallon RH, 'The Meaning of Legal "Meaning" and Its Implications for Theories of Legal Interpretation' (2015) 82 University of Chicago Law Review 1235

Fuller LL, The Morality of Law (rev edn, Yale University Press 1969)

Gelter M and Siems MM, 'Language, Legal Origins, and Culture Before the Courts: Cross-Citations Between Supreme Courts in Europe' (2013) 21 Supreme Court Economic Review 215 < >

https://doi.org/10.1086/675270

Gizbert-Studnicki T, Język prawny z perspektywy socjolingwistycznej (Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Prace z nauk politycznych, z 26, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe 1986)

Green L, 'The Concept of Law Revisited' (1996) 94 Michigan Law Review 1687

https://doi.org/10.2307/1289966

Greenawalt K, Statutory and Common Law Interpretation (OUP 2013)

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756148.001.0001

Grice HP, 'Utterer's Meaning, Sentence Meaning, and Word-Meaning' (1968) 4 Foundations of Language 225

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2727-8_2

Guastini R, 'Rule‐Scepticism Restated' in Leslie Green and Brian Leiter (eds), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law: Volume 1 (OUP 2011) 138

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606443.003.0004

Guastini R, 'Juristenrecht: Inventing Rights, Obligations, and Powers' in Ferrer Beltrán J, Moreso JJ and Papayannis DM (eds), Neutrality and Theory of Law (Springer 2013) 147 < 7_7>

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6067-

Guastini R, 'An Exercise in Legal Realism' (2020) 25 Iuris Dictio 37 < >

https://doi.org/10.18272/iu.v25i25.1630

Hannah MA and Mootz FJ III, 'The Ethos of Originalism' in Brian N Larson and Elizabeth C Britt (eds), Rhetorical Traditions & Contemporary Law (Cambridge University Press, forthcoming 2025)

https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009524087.004

Hart HLA, The Concept of Law (2nd edn, OUP 1994)

Kiefel S, 'The Academy and the Courts: What Do They Mean to Each Other Today?' (2020) 44(1) Melbourne University Law Review 447

Klesch R, Hill G and Price D, 'The Academy and the Courts: Citation Practices' (2023) 42(1) University of Queensland Law Journal 103 < v42i1.674>

https://doi.org/10.38127/uqlj.

Kötz H, 'Scholarship and the Courts: A Comparative Survey' in David S Clark (ed), Comparative and Private International Law: Essays in Honor of John Henry Merryman on His Seventieth Birthday (Duncker & Humblot, 1990) 183

Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, 'Judges and Academics in the United Kingdom' (2010) 29(1) University of Queensland Law Journal 29

Marmor A, The Language of Law (OUP 2014)

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714538.001.0001

Matczak M, 'Does Legal Interpretation Need Paul Grice? Reflections on Lepore and Stone's Imagination and Convention' (2016) 10(1) Polish Journal of Philosophy 67 < >

https://doi.org/10.5840/pjphil20161014

Matczak M, 'The Semantics of Openness: Why References to Foreign Judicial Decisions Do Not Infringe the Sovereignty of National Legal Systems' in Kjaer AL and Lam J (eds), Language and Legal Interpretation in International Law (OUP 2022) 64 < >

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190855208.003.0004

Matczak M, 'Three Kinds of Intention in Lawmaking' (2017) 36 Law and Philosophy 651 < >

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-017-9302-8

McKinsey M, 'Skepticism and Content Externalism' (Winter 2024 Edition) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Edward N Zalta and Uri Nodelman eds) <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2024/entries/skepticism- content-externalism/> accessed 21 May 2025

Merrill TW, 'Faithful Agent, Integrative, and Welfarist Interpretation' (2010) 14 Lewis and Clark Law Review 1565

Moore MS, 'A Natural Law Theory of Interpretation' (1985) 58 Southern California Law Review 277

Nicholls GVV, 'Legal Periodicals and the Supreme Court of Canada' (1950) 28(4) Canadian Bar Review 422

Nourse V, 'Picking and Choosing Text: Lessons for Statutory Interpretation from the Philosophy of Language' (2017) 69 Florida Law Review 1409

https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748698295-007

Ohlendorf JD, 'Against Coherence in Statutory Interpretation' (2014) 90 Notre Dame Law Review 735

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2309071

Peczenik A and Bergholz G, 'Statutory Interpretation in Sweden' in D Neil MacCormick and Robert S Summers (eds), Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study (1st edn, Ashgate 1991, republished Routledge 2016)

Petherbridge L and Schwartz DL, 'An Empirical Assessment of the Supreme Court's Use of Legal Scholarship' (2015) 106 Northwestern University Law Review 995

Piety TR, 'In Praise of Legal Scholarship' (2017) 25 William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 801

Poggi F, 'Against the Conversational Model of Legal Interpretation: On the Difference Between Legislative Intent and Speaker's Intention' (2020) 40 Revus 9 <https://doi. org/10.4000/revus.5694>

Putnam H, 'The Meaning of "Meaning"' in H Putnam, Philosophical Papers, Vol 2: Mind, Language and Reality (CUP 1975) 215

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625251

Roznai Y, 'A Bird is Known by its Feathers: On the Importance and Complexities of Definitions in Legislation' (2014) 2 Theory and Practice of Legislation 145 <https:// >

https://doi.org/10.5235/2050-8840.2.2.145

Slocum BG, Ordinary Meaning: A Theory of the Most Fundamental Principle of Legal Interpretation (University of Chicago Press 2015)

https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226304991.001.0001

Solum LB, 'We Are All Originalists Now' in Robert W Bennett and Lawrence B Solum (eds), Constitutional Originalism: A Debate (Cornell University Press 2011)

https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9780801447938.003.0001

Sunstein CR, 'Practical Reason and Incompletely Theorized Agreements' (1998) 51 Current Legal Problems 267, < >

https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/51.1.267

Stavropoulos N, Objectivity in Law (Clarendon 1996)

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198258995.001.0001

Tobia K, Slocum BG and Nourse V, 'Progressive Textualism' (2022) 110 Georgetown Law Journal 1437

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4118953

Tobor Z, W poszukiwaniu intencji prawodawcy (Wolters Kluwer Polska 2013)

Troper M, Grzegorczyk C and Gardies J-L, 'Statutory Interpretation in France' in Donald Neil MacCormick and Robert S Summers (eds), Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study (1st edn, Ashgate 1991, republished Routledge 2016)

Wood DP, 'Legal Scholarship for Judges' (2015) 124 Yale Law Journal 2592

Zuleta-Puceiro E, 'Statutory Interpretation in Argentina' in Donald Neil MacCormick and Robert S Summers (eds), Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study (1st edn, Ashgate 1991, republished Routledge 2016)

Similar publications