MISGUIDED COPYING OF ANGLO-AMERICAN PATTERNS? INTENTIONALISM AS A REASONABLE PROPOSAL FOR A CONTEMPORARY CONTINENTAL JUDGE

Alexander L, ‘Connecting the Rule Recognition and Intentionalist Interpretation. An Essay in Honor of Richard Kay’ (2021) 52 Connecticut Law Review 1522–1532

Balkin J, ‘Original Meaning and Constitutional Redemption’ (2007) 24 Constitutional Commentary 427–532

Barnett R, Bernick E, The Original Meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. Its Letter and Spirit (Cambridge 2021)

Bielska-Brodziak A, Śladami prawodawcy faktycznego. Materiały legislacyjne jako narzędzie wykładni prawa (Warsaw 2017)

Bielska-Brodziak A, ‘Using Legislative History in Interpreting Polish Law: Examples of Changes in Understanding Principles of Law During the Transition Period’ (2019) 2 Acta Universitatis Carolinae – Iuridica 37–53

Blackstone W, Commentaries on Laws of England (book 1, 9th edn, Oxford 1783)

Bogucki O, Model wykładni funkcjonalnej w derywacyjnej koncepcji wykładni prawa (Szczecin 2016)

Boike P, ‘O różnym pojmowaniu intencji prawodawcy w dyskursie anglosaskim – analiza poglądów Stanleya Fisha, Larry’ego Alexandra, Jeffreya Goldsworthy’ego, Richarda Ekinsa oraz Victorii Nourse’ (2023) 4 Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej 15–26

Boike P, ‘Intencjonalizm a tradycyjna koncepcja wykładni Eugeniusza Waśkowskiego. Analiza porównawcza’ (2024) 13(4) Prawo i Więź 323–345

Coney Barrett A, ‘2019 Sumner Canary Memorial Lecture. Assorted Canards of Contemporary Legal Analysis: Redux’ (2020) 70 Case Western Reserve Law Review 855–869

Court de Cassation, Motivation enrichie: le guide de redaction (Paris 2023)

Dijon X, Méthodologie juridique: l’application de la norme (Bruxelles 1990)

Drakeman D, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory. Why We Need the Framers (Cambridge 2021)

Dubiński Ł, ‘Materiały legislacyjne w procesie interpretacyjnym’ (2023) 14(48) Horyzonty Polityki 59–78

Dworkin R, Law’s Empire (Cambridge 1986)

Ekins R, Goldsworthy J, ‘The Reality and Indispensability of Legislative Intention’ (2014) 6 Sydney Law Review 9–68

Ekins R, ‘Legislative Intent in Law’s Empire’ (2011) 24 Ratio Juris 435–460

Eskridge W, Dynamic Statutory Interpretation (Cambridge 1994)

Eskridge W, ‘The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. Twentieth-Century Statutory Interpretation in a Nutshell’ (1993) 61 George Washington Law Review 1744–1745

Florczak-Wątor M (ed), Constitutional Law and Precedent (Abingdon 2022)

Frieling T, Gezetzesmaterialen und Wille des Gesetzgebers (Tübingen 2017)

Frydman B, Le Sens des lois. Histoire de l’interprétation et de la raison juridique (Bruxelles-Paris 2005)

Frydman B, ‘Exégèse et philologie: un cas d’herméneutique comparée’ (1994) 33 Revue interdisciplinaire d’études juridiques 59–83

Germain C, ‘Approaches to Statutory Interpretation and Legislative History in France’ (2003) 13 Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 195–206

Greenberg M, ‘Legal Interpretation’ in E Zalta (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition) <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/legal-interpretation/> accessed 28 February 2025

Grice HP, Studies in the way of words (Cambridge-London 1989)

Halpérin J-L, ‘École de l’Exégèse’ in Sellers M and Stephen K (eds), Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy (Dordrecht 2023) 837–840

Hart H, Sacks A, The Legal Process. Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law (Westbury 1994)

Goldsworthy J, ‘Subjective versus Objective Intentionalism in Legal Interpretation’ in H Hurd (ed), Moral Puzzles and Legal Perplexities. Essays in the Influence of Larry Alexander (Cambridge 2018) 170–188

Goldsworthy J, ‘The Meaning and Interpretation of Statutes in Anglo-American Legal Systems’ in T Gizbert-Studnicki, F Poggi and I Skoczeń (eds), Interpretivism and the Limits of Law (Northampton 2022) 43–59

Jellum L, Mastering Statutory Interpretation (2nd edn, Durham 2013)

Konca P, ‘Legislative Materials in the Light of Polish and Spanish Law, Judicial Practice and Theoretical Literature’ (2018) 1 Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej 38–50

Krotoszyński M., ‘Legislative History, Ratio Legis, and the Concept of the Rational Legislator’, in Ratio Legis. Philosophical and Theoretical Perspectives (Klappstein V and Dybowski M eds, Cham 2018) 57–73

Kruk M, ‘Proces wykładni w teorii francuskiej szkoły egzegezy’ (2018) 1 Państwo i Prawo 24–39

MacCormick D-N and Summers R (eds), Interpreting Precedent. A Comparative Study, Aldershot, Brookfield, Singapore (Sydney 1997)

Manning J, ‘The Absurdity Doctrine’ (2003) 116 Harvard Law Review 2388–2486

Manning J, ‘What divides textualists from purposivists?’ (2006) 106 Columbia Law Review 70–111

Mańko R, ‘Demons of the Past? Legal Survivals of the Socialist Legal Tradition in Contemporary Polish Private Law’ in R Mańko, C Cercel, A Sulikowski (eds), Law and Critique in Central Europe: Questioning the Past, Resisting the Present (Oxford 2016) 66–89

Meyer S, ‘Subjective or Objective Legislative Intention: An Australian/German Perspective’ (2024) 1 Statute Law Review 1–19

Merrill T, ‘Faithful Agent, Integrative, and Welfarist Interpretation’ (2010) 14 Lewis & Clark Law Review 1565–1600

Müller F, Fallanalysen zur juristichen Methodik (2nd edn, Berlin 1989)

Perelman Ch, Logique juridique. Nouvelle rhétorique (2nd edn, Paris 1999)

Posner R, ‘Pragmatic Adjudication’ in M Dickstein (ed), The Revival of Pragmatism. New Essays on Social Thought, Law, and Culture (Durham 1998)

Radin M, ‘Statutory Interpretation’ (1930) 56 Harvard Law Review 863–885

Scalia A, A Matter of Interpretation. Federal Courts and the Law (2nd edn, Princeton 2018)

Rodríguez-Toubes Muñiz J, ‘El criterio histórico en la interpretación jurídica’ (2013) 22 Dereito 599–632

Rüthers B, Die Heimliche Revolution Vom Rechtsstaat Zum Richterstaat. Verfassung und Methoden. ein Essay, (2nd edn Tübingen 2016)

Rüthers B, Die Unbegrenzte A uslegung. Zum Wandel der Privatrechtsordnung im Nationalsozialismus (9th edn, Tübingen 2022)

Sadurski W, Rights Before Courts A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe (Dordrecht 2005)

Sehl Markus, Was will der Gesetzgeber?: Ziel und Methode rationaler Argumentation mit Gesetzesmaterialien (Baden-Baden 2019)

Shapiro M, Courts. A Comparative and Political Analysis (Chicago-London 1981)

Schauer F, ‘A Critical Guide to Vehicles in the Park’ (2008) 83 New York University Law Review 1109–1134

Sokalska E, Augustyniak M, ‘French Jurisprudence and the Dispute over the Method. From Positivist Exegesis to Free Scientific Research’ (2021) 6 Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego 224–235

Sokołowski J, Transnaród. Polacy w poszukiwaniu politycznej formy (Kraków 2023)

Solan L, ‘Private Language, Public Laws: The Central Role of Legislative Intent in Statutory Interpretation’ (2004) 93 The Georgetown Law Journal 427–486

Steiner E, French Law. A Comparative Approach (2nd edn Oxford 2018)

Stolleis M, ‘Judicial Interpretation in Transition from the Ancien Régime to Constitutionalism’ in Y Morigiwa, M Stolleis and J-L Halpérin (eds), Interpretation of Law in the Age of Enlightenment. From the Rule of the King to the Rule of Law (Dordrecht 2011) 31–17

Summers R and Taruffo M, ‘Interpretation and Comparative Analysis’ in D-N Mac-Cormick and R Roberts (eds), Interpreting Statutes. A Comparative Study (Aldershot 2016) 461–510

Tobor Z, W poszukiwaniu intencji prawodawcy (Warsaw 2013)

Viola F and Zaccaria G, Diritto e interpretazione Lineamenti di teoria ermeneutica del diritto (9th edn, Laterza 2016)

Waldron J, Law and Disagreement (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999)

Waśkowski E, Teoria wykładni prawa cywilnego. Metodologia dogmatyki cywilistycznej w zarysie (Warsaw 1936)

Wischmeyer T, Zwecke im Recht des Verfassungsstaates. Geschichte und Theorie einer juristischen Denkfigur (Tübingen 2015)

Wills D, ‘Domestic Violence in The Times. From Civil Unrest to Spouse Abuse’, The New York Times 10 September 2014 <https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/11/upshot/domestic-violence-in-the-times-from-civil-unrest-to-spouse-abuse.html> accessed 28 February 2025

Wintr J, ‘Canones of Savigny as the Basis for Interpretation of the Law in European Continental Legal Culture’, in Dawid Bunikowski (ed), Historical and Philosophical Foundations of European Legal Culture (Newcastle upon Tyne 2016) 117–136

Zieliński M, Wykładnia prawa. Zasady, reguły, wskazówki (7th edn, Warsaw 2017)

Zieliński M and others, ‘Zintegrowanie polskich koncepcji wykładni prawa’ (2009) 4 Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 23–39

Ziembiński Z, ‘Lex and Ius in the Period of Transformation’ (2019) 10 Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review 111–129

Zweigert K, Kötz H, An introduction to comparative law (2nd edn, Oxford 1998)