en

THE GLOBAL REGULATION OF SURROGACY: COMPARATIVE LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS AND THE CASE FOR ABOLITION

2026, 110, No. 1

Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń


Publication date

30.06.2026

Publishing model

open access

License type


Field

law studies

Discipline

law

Language of publication

English

Downloads

PDF 468 KB

Article

Number of views:52

Number of downloads:27

Crossref citations:0

Altmetric score:0


Abstract

Surrogacy, long debated at the crossroads of law, ethics, and culture, entered a new phase of polarisation in 2024 and 2025. Judicial rulings, legislative initiatives, and international documents revealed not a trajectory of convergence but a fractured landscape, in which prohibitionist, restrictive, permissive, and emergent approaches coexist in tension. This article offers a comprehensive comparative analysis of these developments, drawing on national case law and legislation, as well as regional and international instruments. It highlights how divergent models engage with fundamental principles such as the best interests of the child, the dignity of gestational mothers, and the structural risks of exploitation, while also situating current debates within broader cultural logics that privilege adult reproductive projects – what scholars have termed adultcentrism. By integrating national reforms with emerging international instruments – including the 2024 EU Directive on trafficking, the 2024 UN General Assembly Resolution on violence against women and girls, the 2025 Report of the UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls, its causes and consequences – the article underscores the need to reassess the adequacy of existing paradigms. It concludes that only an abolitionist framework can coherently address the structural harms of surrogacy – commodification, the transformation of adult desire into entitlement, the disproportionate burdens on women, risks to health, and the dangers of exploitation and human trafficking – while safeguarding the rights of children and women.

Keywords:

Bibliography

Doughty S, ‘1.7 million embryos created for IVF have been thrown away, and just 7 per cent lead to pregnancy’ Daily Mail (27 December 2012) <https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2255107/1-7-million-embryos-created-IVF-thrown-away-just-7-cent-leadpregnancy.html> accessed 26 September 2025

Golombok S and others, ‘Children Born through Reproductive Donation: A Longitudinal Study of Psychological Adjustment’ (2013) 54 Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 653 < >

https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12015

Goode DA, ‘Kids, Culture and Innocents’ (1986) 9 Human Studies 83 < >

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142911

Radin MJ, ‘Market-Inalienability’ (1987) 100 Harvard Law Review 1849

Reuss PM, ‘Surrogacy’ in B Stark and J Heaton (eds), Routledge Handbook of InternationalFamily Law (Routledge 2019) 225

Reynolds MA and others, ‘Risk of Multiple Birth Associated with In Vitro Fertilization Using Donor Eggs’ (2001) 154 American Journal of Epidemiology 1043 < >

https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/154.11.1043

Sandel MJ, What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets (Farrar, Straus and Giroux 2013)

Schieve LA and others, ‘Low and Very Low Birth Weight in Infants Conceived with Use of Assisted Reproductive Technology’ (2002) 346 New England Journal of Medicine 731 < >

https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa010806

Trueman C, The Rise and Triumph of the Modern Self: Cultural Amnesia, Expressive Individualism and the Road to Sexual Revolution (Crossway 2020)

Vanney MA, ‘Evolución global de los marcos legales sobre maternidad sustituta’ (2025) 52(2) Revista Chilena de Derecho 123 < >

https://doi.org/10.7764/R.522.5

Waters E, ‘Inconclusive: The Research on Surrogacy’s Impact on Children’ (The Heritage Foundation, 27 March 2024) <https://www.heritage.org/marriage-and-family/commentary/inconclusive-the-research-surrogacys-impact-children> accessed 13 September 2025

Similar publications