AT THE CROSSROADS OF PEACE AND DENIAL: SREBRENICA THIRTY YEARS LATER
2026, 111, No. 1
Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 398 KB
Number of views:3
Number of downloads:2
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
The article examines the enduring tensions between law, politics, and collective memory in Bosnia and Herzegovina, thirty years after the Srebrenica genocide. While the atrocity has been firmly established by international courts, its domestic remembrance remains fractured, shaped by the institutional design of the Dayton Peace Agreement and the persistence of ethno-nationalist narratives. The paper explores how Dayton’s power-sharing system entrenched competing identities and enabled the politicization of memory, contributing to the normalization of genocide denial in Republika Srpska and Serbia. It further analyses the emergence, forms, and political functions of denialism, as well as its impact on reconciliation and social cohesion. Finally, the article assesses the 2021 Memory Law imposed by the High Representative, evaluating its potential and limitations in countering denial and promoting accountability. The study argues that without firm legal and political protection of historical truth, prospects for genuine reconciliation remain constrained.
Bibliography
Aitken R, ‘Cementing Divisions? An Assessment of the Impact of International Intervention and Peace-Building Policies on Ethnic Identities and Divisions’ (2007) 28(3) Policy Studies 247–267
Benedizione L and Scotti VR (eds), Twenty Years after Dayton: The Constitutional Transition of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Rome: Luiss University Press 2016)
Björkdahl A, ‘A Gender Just Peace? Exploring the Post-Dayton Peace Process in Bosnia’ (2012) 37(2) Peace & Change 286–312
Borger J, ‘EU Working to Amend Genocide Denial Law That Is Blamed for Bosnia Crisis’, The Guardian, 22 December 2021, <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/dec/22/eu-working-to-amend-law-on-srebrenica-genocide-denial-to-blame-for-bosniacrisis> accessed 10 October 2025.
Campbell D, National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity, and Justice in Bosnia (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 1998)
Clark JN, ‘Judging the ICTY: Has It Achieved Its Objectives?’ (2009) 9(1–2) Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 123–142
Delpla I, ‘In the Midst of Injustice: The ICTY from the Perspective of Some Victim Associations’ in X Bougarel, E Helms, and G Duijzings (eds), The New Bosnian Mosaic: Identities, Memories and Moral Claims in a Post-War Society, (Farnham: Ashgate Publishing 2007) 211–234
Dougherty BK, ‘Letting Nature Swallow the Past: Politics, Memory, and Abandoned Monuments in Postwar Bosnia and Herzegovina’ (2019) 47(2) Nationalities Papers 248–263
Duijzings G, ‘Commemorating Srebrenica: Histories of Violence and the Politics of Memory in Eastern Bosnia’ in X Bougarel, E Helms, and G Duijzings (eds), The New Bosnian Mosaic: Identities, Memories and Moral Claims in a Post-War Society (Farnham: Ashgate Publishing 2007) 141–166
Green MH, Srebrenica Genocide Denial Report 2020, Srebrenica-Potočari Memorial and Cemetery for the Victims of the 1995 Genocide (2020)
Helms E, Innocence and Victimhood: Gender, Nation, and Women’s Activism in Postwar Bosnia and Herzegovina (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press 2013)
Hlišović H, ‘25 Years after Srebrenica: Local Genocide’ in Bosnian Genocide Denial and Triumphalism: Origins, Impact and Prevention (Hikmet Karcić ed, Sarajevo: University of Sarajevo 2021)
Horelt MA, ‘Serbia-Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina: Different Apology Packages, Different Successes’ in Apology and Reconciliation in International Relations: The Importance of Being Sorry, (Christopher Daase ed, New York: Routledge 2016)
Hronešová JB and Hasić J, ‘The 2021 Memory Law in Bosnia and Herzegovina Reconciliation or Polarization?’ (2024) 26(4) Journal of Genocide Research 399–417
Kalyvas S and Sambanis N, ‘Bosnia’s Civil War,’ in Paul Collier and Nicholas Sambanis (eds), Understanding Civil War: Evidence and Analysis, (Washington, DC: World Bank 2005), vol. 2, 191–229
Kapic T, ‘The Dayton Peace Agreement in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Lessons from the Design of Political Institutions for a United Ireland’ (2022) 33(2) Irish Studies in International Affairs 1–17
Karabeg O, ‘Most: Da li će Dodik ovog puta ići do kraja?’ Radio Slobodna Evropa, 31 October 2021 <https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/most-dodik-prijetnje/31537058.html> accessed 15 August 2025
Karčić H, ‘Srebrenica Genocide Denial: From Dodik to TikTok’ in Sead Turčalo and Hikmet Karčić (eds) Bosnian Genocide Denial and Triumphalism: Origins, Impact and Prevention (Sarajevo: University of Sarajevo 2021)
Kostić R, ‘Transitional Justice and Reconciliation in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Whose Memories, Whose Justice?’(2012) 54(4) Sociologija 649–666
Kuloglija N and Husarić A, ‘Bosnian Genocide Denial Ban Pleases Survivors, Angers Serbs’ Balkan Insight, 23 July 2021
Kuloglija N and Husarić A, ‘Žrtve očekuju da se zabrana negiranja genocida počne sankcionisati odmah [The victims expect the ban on denial of genocide to be sanctioned immediately]’ BIRN, 23 July 2021 <https://detektor.ba/2021/07/23/zrtve-ocekuju-da-se-zabrana-negiranjagenocida-pocne-sankcionisati-odmah/> accessed 1 August 2025
McMahon P and Western J, ‘The Death of Dayton: How to Stop Bosnia from Falling Apart’ (2009) 88(5) Foreign Affairs 69–83
Mulaj K, ‘Genocide and Ending of War: Meaning, Remembrance and Denial in Srebrenica, Bosnia’ (2017) 68 Crime, Law, and Social Change 123–143
Myl-Chojnacka M, ‘Association “Mothers of Srebrenica”: The Fight with Injustice and Uncertainty’ in Marilisa D’Amico, Tania Groppi, and Costanza Nardocci (eds), Women and Peace: The Role of Women and Women’s Civil Society Organizations in Peace Processes (Milano: FrancoAngeli 2024) 149–163
Nettelfield L, Courting Democracy in Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Hague Tribunal’s Impact in a Postwar State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010)
Nielsen ChA, ‘Surmounting the Myopic Focus on Genocide: The Case of the War in Bosnia and Herzegovina’ (2013) 15(1) Journal of Genocide Research 21–39
Nystuen G, Achieving Peace or Protecting Human Rights? Conflict Between Norms Regarding Ethnic Discrimination in the Dayton Peace Agreement (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2005)
O’Brien J, ‘The Dayton Agreement in Bosnia: Durable Cease-Fire, Permanent Negotiations’ in William Zartman and Victor Kremenyuk (eds), Peace versus Justice: Negotiations, Forward- and Backward-Looking Outcomes (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2005) 93–116
OSCE Warns Against Hate Incidents Destabilising Bosnia, Reuters, US News, 12 January 2022 <https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2022-01-12/osce-warns-againsthate-incidents-destabilising-bosnia> accessed 2 October 2025
Parent G, ‘Genocidal Denial: Perpetuating Victimization and the Cycle of Violence in Bosnia and Herzegovina’ (2016) 10(2) Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal 38–58
Puhalo S and Toma M, Kako Mladi u Bosni i Hercegovini Opazaju Protekli Rat? (Banja Luka: Art Print 2022)
Ramet S, ‘The Denial Syndrome and Its Consequences: Serbian Political Culture since 2000’ (2017) 40(1) Communist and Post-Communist Studies 41–58
Rudić F, ‘Bosnian Serb War Commissions ‘Seeking to Revise Truth: Academics’ (2019) Balkan Insight Ruge M, ‘The Past and the Furious: How Russia’s Revisionism Threatens
Bosnia– European Council on Foreign Relations’ ECFR, 13 September 2022 <https://ecfr.eu/publication/the-past-and-the-furious-how-russias-revisionism threatens-bosnia/> accessed 2 October 2025
Sadiković M, ‘Narrating the War Experience: The Politics of War Memory and Commemoration within the Framed Peace Process in Bosnia and Herzegovina’ (PhD diss., University of Brighton 2019)
Stojanović D, ‘Memory Laws: The Continuation of Yugoslav Wars by Other Means, in Elazar Barkan and Ariella Lang (eds), Memory Laws and Historical Justice: The Politics of Criminalizing the Past (Switzerland: McMillan 2022)
Subotić J, ‘Holocaust and the Meaning of the Srebrenica Genocide: A Reflection on a Controversy’ (2022) 24(1) Journal of Genocide Research 71–82
Szasz P, ‘The Dayton Accord: The Balkan Peace Agreement’(1997) 30(3) Cornell International Law Journal 759–768
Trbovc JM, ‘Public Narratives of the Past in the Framework of Transitional Justice Processes: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina,’ (PhD diss., University of Ljubljana 2014)
Williams P and Schafer M, Peace with Justice? War Crimes and Accountability in the Former Yugoslavia (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2002)
Woelk J, ‘The Constitutional Transition of Bosnia and Herzegovina between Nationalism and European Conditionality,’ in Ludovica Benedizione and Valentina Rita Scotti (eds), Twenty Years after Dayton: The Constitutional Transition of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Rome: Luiss University Press 2016) 25–48
Zvijerac P, ‘Top International Official in Bosnia Criminalizes Genocide Denial’ Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 23 July 2021, sec. Bosnia-Herzegovina. <https://www.rferl. org/a/russia-bosnia-high-representative/31373163.html> accessed 15 August 2025
Other articles from the issue
11.08.2026
real rightsdivided propertyDuchy of WarsawCongress PolandDIVIDED OWNERSHIP IN LEGISLATION AND LEGAL PRACTICE OF THE DUCHY OF WARSAW AND THE CONGRESS POLAND
Piotr Z Pomianowski
12.08.2026
pharmaceuticals in the environment (PiE)EU lawpharmaceutical lawenvironmental protectionwaste lawLOST IN DEFINITION: THE LEGAL STATUS OF PHARMACEUTICAL WASTE IN EU LAW
Zofia Kołodziej
12.08.2026
Alternative Dispute Resolutionnegotiationmediationreleasenegotiated settlementmediated settlementenforcement of negotiated settlementenforcement of mediated settlementapproval of negotiated settlementapproval of mediation settlementsettlementamicable settlementcourt settlementENFORCEMENT OF NEGOTIATED AND MEDIATED SETTLEMENTS IN THE EU AND IN THE ANGLOSPHERE: A COMPARATIVE APPROACH
Piotr Sławicki, Stephen Ware